(wL) Forums

Full Version: Ping these IP's
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
Thanks guys!

I'm sure other people can post their pings too, it only takes a couple of minutes. I'd really appreciate it.
C:\Users>ping 67.220.206.1

Pingen naar 67.220.206.1 met 32 bytes aan gegevens:
Antwoord van 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 tijd=177 ms TTL=243
Antwoord van 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 tijd=177 ms TTL=243
Antwoord van 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 tijd=177 ms TTL=243
Antwoord van 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 tijd=185 ms TTL=243

Ping-statistieken voor 67.220.206.1:
Pakketten: verzonden = 4, ontvangen = 4, verloren = 0
(0% verlies).

De gemiddelde tijd voor het uitvoeren van één bewerking in milliseconden:
Minimum = 177ms, Maximum = 185ms, Gemiddelde = 179ms


C:\Users>ping 173.231.20.18

Pingen naar 173.231.20.18 met 32 bytes aan gegevens:
Antwoord van 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 tijd=177 ms TTL=51
Antwoord van 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 tijd=177 ms TTL=51
Antwoord van 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 tijd=177 ms TTL=51
Antwoord van 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 tijd=177 ms TTL=51

Ping-statistieken voor 173.231.20.18:
Pakketten: verzonden = 4, ontvangen = 4, verloren = 0
(0% verlies).

De gemiddelde tijd voor het uitvoeren van één bewerking in milliseconden:
Minimum = 177ms, Maximum = 177ms, Gemiddelde = 177ms


C:\Users>ping 216.144.225.250

Pingen naar 216.144.225.250 met 32 bytes aan gegevens:
Antwoord van 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 tijd=175 ms TTL=53
Antwoord van 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 tijd=177 ms TTL=53
Antwoord van 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 tijd=175 ms TTL=53
Antwoord van 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 tijd=174 ms TTL=53

Ping-statistieken voor 216.144.225.250:
Pakketten: verzonden = 4, ontvangen = 4, verloren = 0
(0% verlies).

De gemiddelde tijd voor het uitvoeren van één bewerking in milliseconden:
Minimum = 174ms, Maximum = 177ms, Gemiddelde = 175ms
Matt, post: 66976, member: 178 Wrote:Thanks guys!

I'm sure other people can post their pings too, it only takes a couple of minutes. I'd really appreciate it.
i got a nice ping Sad
C:\>ping 67.220.206.1

Pinging 67.220.206.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=183ms TTL=246
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=246
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=246
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 67.220.206.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 182ms, Maximum = 183ms, Average = 182ms

C:\>ping 173.231.20.18

Pinging 173.231.20.18 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=54
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=54
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=54
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 173.231.20.18:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 181ms, Maximum = 182ms, Average = 181ms

C:\>ping 216.144.225.250

Pinging 216.144.225.250 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=56
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=183ms TTL=56
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=56
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 216.144.225.250:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 181ms, Maximum = 183ms, Average = 181ms

PS: Ping-ing from Singapore
BARCODE, post: 66792, member: 707 Wrote:i will post mine later tonight..i mean my home connection..Smile
Didn't go home yet? You have to take a break sometimes..

Haha, jkSmile
DK, post: 67012, member: 3039 Wrote:Didn't go home yet? You have to take a break sometimes..

Haha, jkSmile

Gotta get that money.
What is this for? Where are these IP's from? New servers?
67.220.206.1 is our providers premium network test IP

173.231.20.18 is one of our servers IP (Which is meant to be on the premium network)

216.144.225.250 is Quadranet's test IP which is a host that is suppose to have one of the best networks around.
Here are my results.
Pages: 1 2 3