(wL) Forums
No Marijuana does not adversly effect your lungs - Printable Version

+- (wL) Forums (https://war-lords.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Clans (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-17.html)
+--- Forum: Night Watch Headquarters (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-19.html)
+--- Thread: No Marijuana does not adversly effect your lungs (/thread-5861.html)

Pages: 1 2 3


No Marijuana does not adversly effect your lungs - SpartanOnLSD - Jan 11 2012

http://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20120103 .. g-problems

a 2 decade study finds that it doesn't harm your lungs to smoke pot!


RE: No Marijuana does not adversly effect your lungs - Assassin - Jan 11 2012

SpartanOnLSD Wrote:http://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20120103 ... g-problems

a 2 decade study finds that it doesn't harm your lungs to smoke pot!
idk about marijuana but i dont think its as harmful like cigarette when smoked


RE: No Marijuana does not adversly effect your lungs - TheBoss - Jan 11 2012

"Smoking" Anything damages your lungs.
Marijuana is completely safe and not lethal according to several studies.
Find a more professional method to use it then let get it legal Dudeeess.


RE: No Marijuana does not adversly effect your lungs - SpartanOnLSD - Jan 12 2012

TheBoss Wrote:"Smoking" Anything damages your lungs.
Marijuana is completely safe and not lethal according to several studies.
Find a more professional method to use it then let get it legal Dudeeess.

no it may irritate your lungs but marijuana smoke does not do any damage to your lungs.

not only that but you could vaporize it or make edibles, like brownies or almost any kind of candy with marijuana aw well.


RE: No Marijuana does not adversly effect your lungs - i cri everytiem - Jan 12 2012

SpartanOnLSD Wrote:it may irritate your lungs but marijuana smoke does not do any damage to your lungs.
i bet u, some drug dealers will use this as an excuse


RE: No Marijuana does not adversly effect your lungs - SpartanOnLSD - Jan 12 2012

DRUNK_KILLER Wrote:
SpartanOnLSD Wrote:it may irritate your lungs but marijuana smoke does not do any damage to your lungs.
i bet u, some drug dealers will use this as an excuse

an excuse for what?


RE: No Marijuana does not adversly effect your lungs - i cri everytiem - Jan 12 2012

SpartanOnLSD Wrote:
DRUNK_KILLER Wrote:
SpartanOnLSD Wrote:it may irritate your lungs but marijuana smoke does not do any damage to your lungs.
i bet u, some drug dealers will use this as an excuse

an excuse for what?
to use it


RE: No Marijuana does not adversly effect your lungs - SpartanOnLSD - Jan 12 2012

why would you need an excuse to use something that is helpful.

I woul much rather have a small amount of irritation in my lungs than have my liver and kidneys go to shit with all the pharmaceutical pills being pushed in the US.


RE: No Marijuana does not adversly effect your lungs - M. Bison - Jan 12 2012

SpartanOnLSD Wrote:
TheBoss Wrote:"Smoking" Anything damages your lungs.
Marijuana is completely safe and not lethal according to several studies.
Find a more professional method to use it then let get it legal Dudeeess.

no it may irritate your lungs but marijuana smoke does not do any damage to your lungs.

not only that but you could vaporize it or make edibles, like brownies or almost any kind of candy with marijuana aw well.

Article Wrote:What’s more, there was some evidence that very heavy users -- those who smoked the equivalent of a joint a day for 40 years or lit up more than 25 times a month -- might lose lung function.

But because the number of heavy users in the study was small, researchers say they aren’t sure whether those trends are valid or not.

Did either of you fully read the article?


RE: No Marijuana does not adversly effect your lungs - SpartanOnLSD - Jan 12 2012

Yeah i did

M. Bison Wrote:
Article Wrote:What’s more, there was some evidence that very heavy users -- those who smoked the equivalent of a joint a day for 40 years or lit up more than 25 times a month -- might lose lung function.

But because the number of heavy users in the study was small, researchers say they aren’t sure whether those trends are valid or not.

Did either of you fully read the article?

See that part that is bigger. also a keyword is MIGHT