+- (wL) Forums (https://war-lords.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Community (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Ban Appeals (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: Denied Banned for seen as using Ambient Occlusion (/thread-17041.html)
RE: Banned for seen as using Ambient Occlusion - neteX - Oct 15 2017
(Oct 15 2017, 02:46 AM)Jesse_Watters Wrote: i would rerecord the demo if i were you except with the see thru smokes as opposed to what netex uploaded to show the community that is too lazy to watch it themselves
please just stop fucking posting!! you don't have any game knowledge about this game to even detect a fucking cheater unless hes spin botting. Just stop fucking talking for once! you don't know shit
RE: Banned for seen as using Ambient Occlusion - Hamaerox - Oct 15 2017
Did some research over the past day as I didn't know what Ambient Occlusion even was. Definitely looks like it in this case.
Bison has set the example of how these cases are held and I won't be overturning this ban, perhaps Riser or Bison may overturn but I wouldn't hold my breath.
RE: Banned for seen as using Ambient Occlusion - sheev - Oct 16 2017
yeah this dude is pretty clearly walling
RE: Banned for seen as using Ambient Occlusion - Sibrox - Oct 18 2017
Where can I find the demo?
RE: Banned for seen as using Ambient Occlusion - QueenCrazy - Oct 18 2017
(Oct 18 2017, 10:06 AM)Sibrox Wrote: Where can I find the demo?
https://war-lords.net/pugs/61311
I'm pretty sure this is the one you will want to watch.
RE: Banned for seen as using Ambient Occlusion - Sibrox - Oct 19 2017
Gonna watch it when I have the time. fkin exams
RE: Banned for seen as using Ambient Occlusion - Jesse W. - Oct 22 2017
eh, i wouldn't waste the time, sibrox.
alienboy, by not stepping up and doing what i recommended for him to do in my last post, is signaling that he in fact was cheating or using some sort of dishonest advantage to play.
interestingly- he has logged into the forums as recently as earlier today, though, and i find that notable considering most people once they're exposed will step away and back into the recesses of the internet from which they came
i gave him the benefit of the doubt because i genuinely did not see, due to lack of crystal-clear evidence, due to poorly uploaded footage (was mainly focused on the uploader's commentary and fart noises instead of a visual presentation of definite cheating) and from the one run through of the demo i watched, i didn't really see anything that indicated to me beyond a reasonable doubt that he was cheating
objectivity is key when handling these matters, and if this were something that were to be presented to a jury, i'm sure there'd be a 50/50 split between those thinking he's guilty and those thinking he's not guilty.
RE: Banned for seen as using Ambient Occlusion - alienboy - Oct 22 2017
(Oct 22 2017, 10:21 AM)Jesse_Watters Wrote: eh, i wouldn't waste the time, sibrox.The only reason for me not replying and not doing what you recommended was because for one, I couldn't even get the damned glitch to work on my computer. In all instances, smoke for me has been thick and not visible for me to see through it. Plus, I've just been away from my computer, working. Also I don't really care about this anymore because my image has been slandered even though I'm not actually disobeying any underlying rules. The end result will just be in the negative because of my previous ban, plus my past of VAC's. I highly doubt that anyone will stick their head out of their arse and deliver the correct and rightful judgement.
alienboy, by not stepping up and doing what i recommended for him to do in my last post, is signaling that he in fact was cheating or using some sort of dishonest advantage to play.
interestingly- he has logged into the forums as recently as earlier today, though, and i find that notable considering most people once they're exposed will step away and back into the recesses of the internet from which they came
i gave him the benefit of the doubt because i genuinely did not see, due to lack of crystal-clear evidence, due to poorly uploaded footage (was mainly focused on the uploader's commentary and fart noises instead of a visual presentation of definite cheating) and from the one run through of the demo i watched, i didn't really see anything that indicated to me beyond a reasonable doubt that he was cheating
objectivity is key when handling these matters, and if this were something that were to be presented to a jury, i'm sure there'd be a 50/50 split between those thinking he's guilty and those thinking he's not guilty.
RE: Banned for seen as using Ambient Occlusion - Riser - Oct 24 2017
I'll need to check the demo, but if I find proof of cheats I'm going to extend the ban to permanent.
RE: Banned for seen as using Ambient Occlusion - Jesse W. - Oct 24 2017
justice will prevail