naive - Printable Version +- (wL) Forums (https://war-lords.net/forum) +-- Forum: Discussions (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-23.html) +--- Forum: Flame or Admire (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-30.html) +--- Thread: naive (/thread-6028.html) |
RE: naive - pTK - Jan 24 2012 Wait so you do believe in it and know it's ridiculous. Or do you just enjoy to argue so much you take the hardest side to defend and dig in? Either way I was really Hoping this entire time that I wad getting trolled, I dislike thinking this way about other members of the community. Nvm you edited it. I got it. Thank fucking god. That pint you made about black holes killed me. It made sense but the logicwas so backwards I didn't have it in me to respond. RE: naive - naive - Jan 24 2012 It depends on what you mean by "it". Sometimes I believe in concepts that seem ridiculous, but I really believe in them. Sometimes I defend one side of an argument because I feel it is underrepresented and I am trying to form my own opinion about it. I'm the type of person who tries to weigh both sides of any situation carefully, so I am comfortable assuming either side of any argument. Generally if I feel that if there is sufficient information to draw conclusions about things already on the table from others, I won't argue at all. It varies from topic to topic, but I hold beliefs to be very fragile thing, constantly evolving and changing. If you are refering to when I stated "We can not prove that black holes exist (that I am aware of), is there any rational reason to believe they exist?" Do you understand that in context my point was that it may be rational to believe in black holes, despite a lack of conclusive evidence that they exist? I can understand that if you weren't reading what I typed carefully it may seem as though I was saying black holes are irrational to believe in, but I was really defending the claim that it is not always irrational to believe in things that can not be conclusively proved. (I wasn't aware there may be conclusive proof now of black holes at the time, but the analogy still works, pretend i said it in 2009). I really do believe that science can be considered as a form of religion, and I also think scientists shouldn't have to pay taxes because of this! Did I mention I am a scientist? How about that I don't like taxes. If nothing else, accept science as your lord and savior and no more taxes! (consult your accountant) If you think that it is stupid to want science to be viewed as a religion, then you must just love paying taxes, don't you? You all are fucking ruining this shit for me. RE: naive - ruplayer - Jan 24 2012 Forgot to call me to drop some flamez =( RE: naive - henry - Jan 24 2012 totally off topic: naive where you live that you're 25 mins from the boarder to canada? RE: naive - ruplayer - Jan 24 2012 henry Wrote:totally off topic: With your mom... RE: naive - henry - Jan 24 2012 that's cool, ruplayer, but are you naive? RE: naive - George Of The Jungle - Jan 24 2012 naive Wrote:That's the only reason I troll you in the first place. You thought I believed all that shit? Rofl. Thats how persuasive I really am. I really know the flying spaghetti monster created all things. Lies! It was the pink unicorn. RE: naive - i cri everytiem - Jan 24 2012 George, Of The Jungle Wrote:trolololnaive Wrote:That's the only reason I troll you in the first place. You thought I believed all that shit? Rofl. Thats how persuasive I really am. I really know the flying spaghetti monster created all things. RE: naive - ruplayer - Jan 24 2012 henry Wrote:that's cool, ruplayer, but are you naive?Sometimes, I'm naive too bro. |