(wL) All-Time top25 Best W-T-L

(wL) All-Time top25 Best W-T-L - Printable Version

+- (wL) Forums (https://war-lords.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Clans (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-17.html)
+--- Forum: Competitive Section (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: (wL) All-Time top25 Best W-T-L (/thread-16620.html)

Pages: 1 2

RE: (wL) All-Time top25 Best W-T-L - RealRecklezz - Mar 23 2017

Did you ask for top 25 just so that you would make it on the list? lol

RE: (wL) All-Time top25 Best W-T-L - Ben- - Mar 23 2017

(Mar 23 2017, 01:13 AM)RealRecklezz Wrote: Did you ask for top 25 just so that you would make it on the list? lol

nah otherwise i would of asked 1000 pugs + only, making me easily top1 Heart

RE: (wL) All-Time top25 Best W-T-L - ryz - Mar 23 2017

BB Still plays cs Confused

RE: (wL) All-Time top25 Best W-T-L - StolenBread - Mar 24 2017

how come i'm not on there Sad

RE: (wL) All-Time top25 Best W-T-L - Jesse W. - Mar 27 2017

Can we get a list of Top 25 of most L's to W's w/ over x amount of PUGs played?

RE: (wL) All-Time top25 Best W-T-L - RealRecklezz - Mar 28 2017

(Mar 27 2017, 10:01 PM)Jesse_Watters Wrote: Can we get a list of Top 25 of most L's to W's w/ over x amount of PUGs played?

RE: (wL) All-Time top25 Best W-T-L - _nme - Mar 28 2017

need 5 people to win a pug.

If we replace people with teams, yeah would make sense for me. otherwise totally irrelevant judging a individual performance based on a team score. Sound familiar? (rws)

RE: (wL) All-Time top25 Best W-T-L - RealRecklezz - Mar 28 2017

(Mar 28 2017, 02:11 AM)_nme Wrote: need 5 people to win a pug.

If we replace people with teams, yeah would make sense for me. otherwise totally irrelevant judging a individual performance based on a team score. Sound familiar? (rws)

I was talking about win loss ratio but backwards (loss/win ratio). This has nothing to do with rws, it just so happens that the people with the highest loss to win ratios also have the lowest rws.

RE: (wL) All-Time top25 Best W-T-L - Jesse W. - Mar 28 2017

(Mar 28 2017, 01:25 AM)RealRecklezz Wrote:
(Mar 27 2017, 10:01 PM)Jesse_Watters Wrote: Can we get a list of Top 25 of most L's to W's w/ over x amount of PUGs played?

Top 10 L/W ratios (active players with >100 total matches):

1 - (1.654) 7th sense (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/41105784)
2 - (1.639) i aM nOoB (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/173650220)
3 - (1.607) Jack (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/189593275)
4 - (1.556) ^mTM (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/109565629)
5 - (1.515) sol1tare (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/169520939)
6 - (1.500) pez (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/88822628)
7 - (1.479) chuasai (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/114926487)
8 - (1.449) Hypersurge (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/293473645)
9 - (1.431) buttpussyenthusiast (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/113414391)
10 - (1.403) small toy (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/44768269)

Top 10 L/W ratios (active players with >200 total matches)

1 - (1.639) i aM nOoB (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/173650220)
2 - (1.607) Jack (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/189593275)
3 - (1.449) Hypersurge (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/293473645)
4 - (1.403) small toy (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/44768269)
5 - (1.400) StuNN (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/103754091)
6 - (1.381) Plan B (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/704599)
7 - (1.340) Pure no limits (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/56900859)
8 - (1.328) mpls. DOGGER (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/17890689)
9 - (1.307) sift (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/26734153)
10 - (1.283) Noot Noot (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/56364040)

Top 10 L/W ratios (active players with >500 total matches)

1 - (1.639) i aM nOoB (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/173650220)
2 - (1.607) Jack (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/189593275)
3 - (1.400) StuNN (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/103754091)
4 - (1.340) Pure no limits (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/56900859)
5 - (1.328) mpls. DOGGER (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/17890689)
6 - (1.307) sift (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/26734153)
7 - (1.280) dRAGON (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/80508154)
8 - (1.273) [[CS]] spider (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/164082700)
9 - (1.235) path (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/269292)
10 - (1.218) Me.oW (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/31583716)

Honorable mentions (L/W ratio of players with >2000 matches lifetime):

1 - (1.307) sift (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/26734153)
2 - (1.009) public (https://servers.war-lords.net/pugs/players/344961338)

Stats taken from first 20 pages of player list*

LMFAO. Thank you for this. I didn't know this was public / as easily accessible information as it is.

(Mar 28 2017, 02:37 AM)RealRecklezz Wrote:
(Mar 28 2017, 02:11 AM)_nme Wrote: need 5 people to win a pug.

If we replace people with teams, yeah would make sense for me. otherwise totally irrelevant judging a individual performance based on a team score. Sound familiar? (rws)

I was talking about win loss ratio but backwards (loss/win ratio). This has nothing to do with rws, it just so happens that the people with the highest loss to win ratios also have the lowest rws.

"Totally irrelevant" is the best way to describe nme's posts. Looks like he gets a kick out of trying to derail threads & add his low-effort inflammatory comments.

Sound familiar? It's like he's Drago's twin brother, or something. He's rude, his self-importance is incredibly inflated, he thinks he is smart but is dumb, and he is perpetually feeling butthurt, there is no doubt about it.

It's striking, actually, the almost identical deficit in mental faculties they share- I wouldn't be surprised if they were related on account of that alone.