![]() |
|
Expired SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - Printable Version +- (wL) Forums (https://war-lords.net/forum) +-- Forum: Community (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Player Reports (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: Expired SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? (/thread-5949.html) |
SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - i cri everytiem - Jan 19 2012 well weeks ago this player http://wls.gameme.com/playerinfo/340636 got PERM BANNED (which still valid), but according to gameme, this player isnt banned.. can u just clarify me this situation? thanks SOURCEBANS> http://sourcebans.war-lords.net/index.php?p=banlist&searchText=STEAM_0%3A1%3A42416947&Submit= EDIT: i just saw that he got banned again by BAN_EVASION today, thanks anyways.. RE: SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - M. Bison - Jan 19 2012 GameMe doesn't properly reflect a users ban status. If a player can join the server, which under the amnesty program they can, then it'll mark them as not banned although they are. If you're referring to the earlier incident today, then that was due to a very rare bug, but it has already been fixed. RE: SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - i cri everytiem - Jan 19 2012 wait a sec, hes under the amnesty program? RE: SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - M. Bison - Jan 19 2012 No, of course not, but banned users are handled that way by default. This shouldn't really matter since they aren't able to do anything. And no, they can't even command spam either. RE: SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - i cri everytiem - Jan 19 2012 M. Bison Wrote:No, of course not, but banned users are handled that way by default. This shouldn't really matter since they aren't able to do anything. And no, they can't even command spam either.http://wls.gameme.com/player_histories/chat/340636 ok.. if u said so.. and tanks for replying, i just wanted to make sure that rules are running to this player! thanks RE: SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - Bloodlust Hero - Jan 21 2012 If we're speaking on behalf of Gabestep, I banned him a few days ago when he somehow was able to connect and play on the mg server. Perm ban for mic spam. He asked me to ban him permanently because he wasn't suppose to be able to play, so I said. "Okay, banned.". Haha. Oh, and Bison. You should make a rule about people who don't want to even be in the server, should be able to be banned. For those players who don't give a shit about anything, and are just there to be fuckups and assholes. All they have to say is "I don't want to be here." and then you can say bye to those ungrateful bastards.
RE: SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - i cri everytiem - Jan 21 2012 Bloodlust Hero Wrote:If we're speaking on behalf of Gabestep, I banned him a few days ago when he somehow was able to connect and play on the mg server. Perm ban for mic spam. He asked me to ban him permanently because he wasn't suppose to be able to play, so I said. "Okay, banned.". Haha.yeah, i saw that and thanks for banning him again. and isnt a bad bad idea that suggestion.. |