[M. Bison]

MeMoRy was banned for stacking PUGs through RQ some time ago. He was warned to find/wait for suitable subs and to check !subs/!rws to ensure the PUG remained balanced when he left (unless he genuinely needed to go). If he's finding suitable subs and not stacking PUGs, then he can RQ all he wants. The main concern is whether he's continuing to find suitable subs before leaving or in meow's case, not bothering to find any at all. It's possible he genuinely needed to go in meow's case and wasn't able to find a sub, though. Ben and I checked his PUGs some days ago since his ban and warning, and he appeared to be keeping PUGs balanced the vast majority of RQs. It'd be interesting to see whether that's still the case.

I'm thinking of adding stats relating to RQing on the PUG site. Maybe showing the # of rqs, # of rqs which caused stacks, and the avg RWS disadvantage it put their team. We could maybe factor in their RQ stacks into !sub and make it nearly impossible for them to !sub in. If the % of RQ stacks becomes absurd then we could also go the route of banning too. There's the potential someone could cause "RQ stacks" inadvertently by giving people their spots back (say if someone RQ'd earlier causing stack and person crashes and subs back in, but the crashed person makes imbalance worse than person giving it back).