(wL) Forums

Full Version: Manstain posting child-porn
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
The title pretty much says it all.  A player logged onto the CSS Warlords server, calling himself "Manstain" posted a pic of a naked girl child performing a sexual act on a male.

He was logged on when I logged on at 11:30, and was still logged on when I logged off at 12:10 PM (PST). 

Take this for what it's worth.  I tried reporting him in game, but only found the cheat-report menu.

thx
Is this him? Also, was it a spray?
Was the girl in the spray visibly underage (as in she looks 16-), or are you not able to tell?
That will largely affect the degree of punishment in this case.

Anonymous

Thanks for your report! If we didn't have people like you, I wouldn't have been playing this game at all. Thank you.
Fucking hate it when people post porn, they should understand that there are kids on too. Only reason I have my sprays turned off.
hostage Wrote:Fucking hate it when people post porn, they should understand that there are kids on too. Only reason I have my sprays turned off.

Yeah when I first saw the "decoy" spray I just removed sprays, wasn't really worth it.
lin3ar Wrote:Was the girl in the spray visibly underage (as in she looks 16-), or are you not able to tell?
That will largely affect the degree of punishment in this case.
The funny thing is in order to confirm that it is in fact child porn, you'd have to make a screenshot of it and confirm with someone. In order to make a screenshot of it and confirm with someone, you'd have to violate various international laws which strictly relate to the distribution of child pornography and thus will get Interpol after you.  :-X
There are bunch of idiot doing this at server #3. If you guys have free time pls take a visit..........
M. Bison Wrote:
lin3ar Wrote:Was the girl in the spray visibly underage (as in she looks 16-), or are you not able to tell?
That will largely affect the degree of punishment in this case.
The funny thing is in order to confirm that it is in fact child porn, you'd have to make a screenshot of it and confirm with someone. In order to make a screenshot of it and confirm with someone, you'd have to violate various international laws which strictly relate to the distribution of child pornography and thus will get Interpol after you.  :-X

That's a lose/lose situation :-\.
M. Bison Wrote:
lin3ar Wrote:Was the girl in the spray visibly underage (as in she looks 16-), or are you not able to tell?
That will largely affect the degree of punishment in this case.
The funny thing is in order to confirm that it is in fact child porn, you'd have to make a screenshot of it and confirm with someone. In order to make a screenshot of it and confirm with someone, you'd have to violate various international laws which strictly relate to the distribution of child pornography and thus will get Interpol after you.  :-X
not necessarily, if you were to distribute said picture through other sites then yes it would be in fact, illegal. but if you had it to prove one of containing child pornography, then that would be a new story.
Pages: 1 2