(wL) Forums

}{@K@P Wrote:jeez guys, if you don't like assault, go to server #2 because there is no assault there. People like assault too!!!!!!!

Who the hell likes Assault?

Me

I stay away from the popular maps servers anyway... unless a buncha people I know are on it

Dre@m$ Wrote:Me

me too bro  :

^i was kidding... and damn it computer i want to play CSS >,<

Removing the map from the servers wouldn't change anything since we can never play on it anyway. Some admins consistently do a mapvote whenever we are on assault - it just happened to me AGAIN a few minutes ago with Mr Tea.

Here's what's happening: usually a map never gets more than half the votes during a mapvote, so it'll end up being something like:
- assault (7 votes)
- italy (5 votes)
- office (5 votes)
- other maps (1 or 2 votes each)

This means that even though assault is the map with the most votes (so it's very logical it gets chosen) it doesn't get more than 50% of the total votes. So then when an admin launches a vote asking "do you want to change the map?", evidently more than half the players will vote "yes" (even more so when the choice is conveniently in first position...). But guess what? The same thing would happen on any other map. Yet this is the typical excuse when an admin changes the map: "they voted yes".

Actually, admins shouldn't even be allowed to launch a mapvote. I mean, give me one situation that would call for a mapvote? If we're on this map it's because people voted for it. If people want to change the map then they can rtv. Simple as that.

So please, if you decide to leave assault on the server (and you should, it can be fun when both teams aren't camping) then DO NOT CHANGE IT EVERY TIME IT GETS SELECTED.

keger Wrote:Removing the map from the servers wouldn't change anything since we can never play on it anyway. Some admins consistently do a mapvote whenever we are on assault - it just happened to me AGAIN a few minutes ago with Mr Tea.

Here's what's happening: usually a map never gets more than half the votes during a mapvote, so it'll end up being something like:
- assault (7 votes)
- italy (5 votes)
- office (5 votes)
- other maps (1 or 2 votes each)

This means that even though assault is the map with the most votes (so it's very logical it gets chosen) it doesn't get more than 50% of the total votes. So then when an admin launches a vote asking "do you want to change the map?", evidently more than half the players will vote "yes" (even more so when the choice is conveniently in first position...). But guess what? The same thing would happen on any other map. Yet this is the typical excuse when an admin changes the map: "they voted yes".

Actually, admins shouldn't even be allowed to launch a mapvote. I mean, give me one situation that would call for a mapvote? If we're on this map it's because people voted for it. If people want to change the map then they can rtv. Simple as that.

So please, if you decide to leave assault on the server (and you should, it can be fun when both teams aren't camping) then DO NOT CHANGE IT EVERY TIME IT GETS SELECTED.

Well said. People should be RTV'ing instead of an admin launching a map vote. An admin doing that doesnt seem fair to all players, imo.

remove. Everytime its voted (which I don't know why people do vote for it) it gets rtv'd with about 15 or more votes. People vote it by accident it seems. Nevermind how bad it is one sided.

DandyAndy Wrote:I think we should privately test out some new maps and implement them onto the servers.. there are more well balanced cs assaults we could trade in its place.

That would be awesome, I'd love having some new maps added to the mix.

Remove the map. It is way to T sided and just very not balanced and unfair.