+- (wL) Forums (https://war-lords.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-23.html)
+--- Forum: Flame or Admire (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-30.html)
+--- Thread: Unknown Admin Abuse (/thread-3324.html)
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - OwnageHN - Aug 12 2011
Mr.Tea Wrote:Again:
Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do.
-Mr.Tea
This makes you look ignorant because you are demonstrating that you don't know the meaning of the original quote by Dale Carnegie.
ruplayer Wrote:#89 fool!report me posting on forums now....
Note that this is an admin trolling an admin abuse thread.
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - Mr.Tea - Aug 12 2011
This had gotten out of hand with this tangent to my quote.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin
lol, my google is better than yours. You are mistaken my friend. You better fact check your claims.
It kind of represents most of your conclusions.
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - DandyAndy - Aug 12 2011
if I had a dollar for every time he called someone "ignorant" :o
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - OwnageHN - Aug 12 2011
DandyAndy Wrote:if I had a dollar for every time he called someone "ignorant" :o
Note that this is currently an admin trolling an admin abuse thread.
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - helmut^ - Aug 14 2011
Rabbit Wrote:xFerior Wrote:In order to do the objective, you have to stay alive. Theoretically, if there were say 5 people guarding a planted bomb, you can't force one CT to rush in there and try to do the objective. That's suicide. I don't have a problem with letting that CT stay in a tunnel, waiting for a T to come to him.
On a side note, the rule says to do the objective. I personally don't think that it was intended to be interpreted as do the objective no matter what or you will get banned. I think it was written to be interpreted as to make an attempt to do the objective.
It was a 1:6 ratio, so its understandable that Ownage doesn't do the objective, as death would be inevitable.
Objectives also include to eliminate the opposing team. If Ownage had a better chance of doing that objective, then I don't see the problem here.
I disagree. You cannot make the assumption that it is death as I’ve seen it done before. Also, if you are going to go down that lane of thinking, you might as well get rid of the damn rule all together, because peoples skill level change, and say if the worst player in the server was against the best player, then its "obvious death". -_- So you’re telling me it’s ok for that worst player to sit in spawn and not do the objective?
Says the kid that lost his admin because he abused it to much.
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - The Rival - Aug 14 2011
helmut^ Wrote:Rabbit Wrote:xFerior Wrote:In order to do the objective, you have to stay alive. Theoretically, if there were say 5 people guarding a planted bomb, you can't force one CT to rush in there and try to do the objective. That's suicide. I don't have a problem with letting that CT stay in a tunnel, waiting for a T to come to him.
On a side note, the rule says to do the objective. I personally don't think that it was intended to be interpreted as do the objective no matter what or you will get banned. I think it was written to be interpreted as to make an attempt to do the objective.
It was a 1:6 ratio, so its understandable that Ownage doesn't do the objective, as death would be inevitable.
Objectives also include to eliminate the opposing team. If Ownage had a better chance of doing that objective, then I don't see the problem here.
I disagree. You cannot make the assumption that it is death as I’ve seen it done before. Also, if you are going to go down that lane of thinking, you might as well get rid of the damn rule all together, because peoples skill level change, and say if the worst player in the server was against the best player, then its "obvious death". -_- So you’re telling me it’s ok for that worst player to sit in spawn and not do the objective?
Says the kid that lost his admin because he abused it to much.
That doesn't really have anything to do with what he said ???
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - Rabbit - Aug 14 2011
helmut^ Wrote:Rabbit Wrote:xFerior Wrote:In order to do the objective, you have to stay alive. Theoretically, if there were say 5 people guarding a planted bomb, you can't force one CT to rush in there and try to do the objective. That's suicide. I don't have a problem with letting that CT stay in a tunnel, waiting for a T to come to him.
On a side note, the rule says to do the objective. I personally don't think that it was intended to be interpreted as do the objective no matter what or you will get banned. I think it was written to be interpreted as to make an attempt to do the objective.
It was a 1:6 ratio, so its understandable that Ownage doesn't do the objective, as death would be inevitable.
Objectives also include to eliminate the opposing team. If Ownage had a better chance of doing that objective, then I don't see the problem here.
I disagree. You cannot make the assumption that it is death as I’ve seen it done before. Also, if you are going to go down that lane of thinking, you might as well get rid of the damn rule all together, because peoples skill level change, and say if the worst player in the server was against the best player, then its "obvious death". -_- So you’re telling me it’s ok for that worst player to sit in spawn and not do the objective?
Says the kid that lost his admin because he abused it to much.
You do realize you just insulted and trolled a current Admin ( Me ), as I did not lose it.... lmao... You also did this remark in someones thread that has nothing to do with you.
Not that if I was or wasn't an admin gives you any right to talk and treat someone like this.
Great way to prove my concerns and opinions of your character helmut.
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - biebsfan - Aug 16 2011
Jesus Christ,
Are you all really having an argument about something that took place in a video game server? CSS is fun, but is it REALLY that important to you? Go outside and go do something more meaningful with your lives. People rage in video games all the time, but let's try (next time) to be a little bit better than that?
Grow up.
-J. Biebs
p.s. this thread reeks of pretentious text
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - Anonymous - Aug 16 2011
biebsfan Wrote:Jesus Christ,
Are you all really having an argument about something that took place in a video game server? CSS is fun, but is it REALLY that important to you? Go outside and go do something more meaningful with your lives. People rage in video games all the time, but let's try (next time) to be a little bit better than that?
Grow up.
-J. Biebs
p.s. this thread reeks of pretentious text
lol I'll better stick with videogame than biebs channel on youtube=) we arent that nerd, it's just our hobbies.
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - keger - Aug 16 2011
That's probably a bit off topic, but Ownage is the only player with a kpd ratio higher than 5.00 in the top 50 (and one of only four players to have a kpd ratio higher than 3.00, to put things into perspective...). Just making an observation, not interpreting anything.