+- (wL) Forums (https://war-lords.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-23.html)
+--- Forum: General Chat (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-24.html)
+--- Thread: An interview with Bison (/thread-10110.html)
RE: An interview with Bison - chun - Mar 20 2013
pfft his reputation will be damaged by a picture of his shoe?! COMON PEOPLE THIS IS WARLORDS what rep are we afraid of being damaged lol
hmm i guess i didnt know bison well enough to know he wouldnt answer anything
RE: An interview with Bison - Cas Beep Beep Im A Jeep - Mar 20 2013
George Of The Jungle, post: 87954, member: 3094 Wrote:Who would that be? :p
I know as much about Bison as I know about Anubis and many others on wl.
I heard Anubis voice twice!! I actually know a couple things about him though lol.
RE: An interview with Bison - _RemiX - Mar 21 2013
This thread has turned disgusting. I want to remove it so badly.
RE: An interview with Bison - Spartacus - Mar 21 2013
_RemiX, post: 87976, member: 3519 Wrote:This thread has turned disgusting. I want to remove it so badly.
We could talk about shoes.
Vibrams fivefingers and minimalist shoes. Are they gimmicky or is there truth to their health concerns?
RE: An interview with Bison - Moriarty - Mar 21 2013
Stop sucking Bison's dick weirdos.
RE: An interview with Bison - Eternal - Mar 21 2013
You know too much.
RE: An interview with Bison - Knowpain - Mar 21 2013
Is he the one who attacked S. Korea recently?
lol, jk his liver might not be this big enough.
RE: An interview with Bison - _RemiX - Mar 21 2013
They normally off zero support thus in the long run being bad for your feet
RE: An interview with Bison - Moriarty - Mar 22 2013
[SIZE=14px]For their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed blood.[/SIZE]
RE: An interview with Bison - Spartacus - Mar 22 2013
_RemiX, post: 88042, member: 3519 Wrote:They normally off zero support thus in the long run being bad for your feetNumerous reports and studies have been completed as far back as 1905 to support the benefits of barefoot running. In 1905 pictures were taken of habitually barefoot feet (below) and compared with pictures of habitually shoed feet. The toes on the barefoot feet were spread out creating a wider and more stable base. It was also possible to draw a straight line from the heel to the big toe indicating a perfect naturally aligned foot looking very similar to the foot of an infant.
![[Image: 1905-barefeet.jpg]](http://www.thepeacefulrunner.com/images/1905-barefeet.jpg)
The toes on the shoed feet (below) were crowded to a point and had taken the shape of the shoe. A straight line could not be drawn from the heel to the big toe indicating misalignment and the negative affect shoes can have on feet. The feet looked distorted and unable to provide the wide base necessary for proper alignment and balance.
![[Image: 1905-shoed-feet.jpg]](http://www.thepeacefulrunner.com/images/1905-shoed-feet.jpg)
In 2004, Dr. Timothy Noakes conducted a study comparing the impact of forefoot strikers and heel strikers. The study concluded that the forefoot strike used by barefoot runners has less than 50 percent shock through the knees than a heel strike -- the most common strike for shoed runners.
In 2010, Dr. Daniel E. Lieberman released the results of a study comparing the mechanics of barefoot runners against those who wear cushioned running shoes. The study determined that most barefoot runners land with a forefoot or mid-foot strike and most shoed runners land with a heel strike.
The study also concluded that the forefoot or mid-foot strike results in almost no impact, while a heel strike has an impact of up to three times the runner's body weight. This supports the theory that heel striking can cause running injuries.
Read more: http://www.thepeacefulrunner.com/barefoot-running.html#ixzz2OEn7JuiE
sharing what i read about it. I'm still not so convinced.