+- (wL) Forums (https://war-lords.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-23.html)
+--- Forum: Flame or Admire (https://war-lords.net/forum/forum-30.html)
+--- Thread: Unknown Admin Abuse (/thread-3324.html)
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - Loks - Aug 11 2011
I wasnt saying you reported dangerdavis! I was saying about ruplyer report and the comment you made after dangerdavis post what he thinks about ruplyer! So whathever im gonna stick with the report and stop arguin with you about irrelevant thing!
I truly belive Mr.Tea is experencied to know when someone is trying to do or not the objective! Im gonna stick with joker comment and if that was the case a slay is valid! If he wasnt even trying to provide cover with his awp to hes temmates to try to move forward and just camp til the round end then a slay is the fair thing he could do!!!
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - OwnageHN - Aug 11 2011
Loks Wrote:I wasnt saying you reported dangerdavis! I was saying about ruplyer report and the comment you made after dangerdavis post what he thinks about ruplyer! So whathever im gonna stick with the report and stop arguin with you about irrelevant thing!
I truly belive Mr.Tea is experencied to know when someone is trying to do or not the objective! Im gonna stick with joker comment and if that was the case a slay is valid! If he wasnt even trying to provide cover with his awp to hes temmates to try to move forward and just camp til the round end then a slay is the fair thing he could do!!!
I didn't say you were saying that I reported DangerDavis. This is another point of why you should stay out of this thread if you cannot interpret English correctly. You evidently also do not understand the situation after reading your reasoning for why a "slay was valid." Please stay out of this thread if you cannot appropriately contribute to it.
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - Mr.Tea - Aug 11 2011
Ownage.HN refer to Canister's post in REF to this:
Quote:This is another point of why you should stay out of this thread if you cannot interpret English correctly. You evidently also do not understand the situation after reading your reasoning for why a "slay was valid." Please stay out of this thread if you cannot appropriately contribute to it.
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - Anonymous - Aug 11 2011
OwnageHN Wrote:DangerDavis Wrote:I have played with Ruplayer for like a few hundred hours on War Lords. I have never seen him to camp when it wasn't appropriate. From my experience Ruplayer has been a very balanced player.
You're bad at CS:S so I wouldn't expect you to know when camping is appropriate.
Here is what Loks was talking about, if you don't want to understand him, I do.
Another thing, if you're in the situation where you're against 10-15 players, don't hide, nobody expect you to complete the objectives, if you wanna survive with your awp then move a little, kill 4-5 out of 15 in 30 sec, or at least try to kill some and nobody will ever slay you.
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - The Rival - Aug 11 2011
OwnageHN Wrote:I agree that it's a public server, but I'm going to play to win.
But you lost. Lol?
Guess it was only a matter of time before I broke my own rules and contributed (albeit poorly) to this issue.
Ownage, I can see why you're mad. From what I have read of the situation, it seems that the odds were stacked against you, and it would have been near suicide for any player to attempt the bomb.
But it's a pub, man. There is no need to save the awp for the next round, chances are that someone else will have the money to buy it and your team will still have an awper, it's fine.
Was this thread really necessary man? Just forgive Tea and maybe change up your style a little so that you have a backup plan for when you get into these situations.
Also I don't understand how you can't comprehend what Loks is saying. His English is extremely good, as is all of our exotic admins
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - Rabbit - Aug 11 2011
I, The Rival Wrote:Also I don't understand how you can't comprehend what Loks is saying. His English is extremely good, as is all of our exotic admins
He does not try to understand Loks. He treats all his admin abuse threads like flame threads. His urge to insult people daily, no matter how low it may be like insulting someone who speaks your language better then you speak his.
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - LagAvenger - Aug 11 2011
I, The Rival Wrote:OwnageHN Wrote:I agree that it's a public server, but I'm going to play to win.
But you lost. Lol?
Guess it was only a matter of time before I broke my own rules and contributed (albeit poorly) to this issue.
Ownage, I can see why you're mad. From what I have read of the situation, it seems that the odds were stacked against you, and it would have been near suicide for any player to attempt the bomb.
But it's a pub, man. There is no need to save the awp for the next round, chances are that someone else will have the money to buy it and your team will still have an awper, it's fine.
Was this thread really necessary man? Just forgive Tea and maybe change up your style a little so that you have a backup plan for when you get into these situations.
Also I don't understand how you can't comprehend what Loks is saying. His English is extremely good, as is all of our exotic admins
lol. "exotic admins"... haha
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - The Rival - Aug 11 2011
I wanted to say "foreign admins", but everyone is foreign here, since this is a world forum
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - Loks - Aug 11 2011
Wow this guy is amazing!!!
loli dont care what he said about me let him say what he want!!!
i clearly remeber Mr.Tea always saying ownage is cool he not hacks and see wath he got a admin abuse report by ownage just because one slay!! O_O
I watched the demo and Mr.Tea give him a warning 2 rounds before than Ts won 2 rounds! in the round ownage is slayed he was the bomb guy!! if i was Mr.Tea i will do the same thing!!!
RE: Unknown Admin Abuse - Mr.Tea - Aug 11 2011
Just to re-iterate:
1st warning he was the last guy for over 1minute. I made him aware of the objectives at 30 seconds because he was camp picking guys in a 1 vs 6. It was 1 vs 6 because his team attempted to push which he did not support. He was overwatching a flank, which is a valid tactic. However, if you watch all the red dots disappear and don't do anything to support. Nothing tactical about that.
Next two rounds he moved with his team and they won with him dying on a push.
The slay round he bait/awped in the tunnels on dust. No problem with that tactic, but if you bait/awp your whole team and its you and some other dude camping in a 2v11. That was your poor choice of strategy. You were prompted at 30 secs about maybe looking at the objectives, but you stayed and waited. The person that I warned for shooting you in the head was obviously frustrated with you not using the awp to pust forward. Regardless, I warned him about shooting snipers in the head.
The picture that is painted on a 2v11 "suicide rush" and save the awp. Again, I waited until 30 secs because that is plenty of time to make forward movement to the objective. Not running straight to the objective and being wiped out, but making some sort of offensive move.
This is not a situational slay. Where I watched him 1 round and slayed for not doing the objectives. I've observed the entire match. He was slow playing both rnds that I had to notify T's of time remaining. That led to my slay of the terrorists left alive the second time for not making any attempt to do the objectives.
This would require peeking to see if anyone was there. If you would have attempted to enter the tunnels and be attacked by overwhelming cts is one thing, but you were using stand-off picking them off.
It was de_dust...when players are aloud to not do the objectives. It turns into 2:30 minutes of 10 players wasting everyone else's time. Just like aztec, italy, and assault.