[JayCat]

If they will watch it in a video, more than likely if they have the opportunity to do it they probably will.

It's just sick and they should be prosecuted.

That's just imo.

Approximately 47 States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands impose penalties on mandatory reporters who knowingly or willfully fail to make a report when they suspect that a child is being abused or neglected.2 Failure to report is classified as a misdemeanor in 39 States and American Samoa, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.3 In Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota, misdemeanors are upgraded to felonies for failure to report more serious situations, while in Illinois and Guam, second or subsequent violations are classified as felonies. Twenty States and the District of Columbia, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands specify in the reporting laws the penalties for failure to report.4 Upon conviction, a mandated reporter who fails to report can face jail terms ranging from 10 days to 5 years or fines ranging from $100 to $5,000. In seven States and American Samoa, in addition to any criminal penalties, the reporter may be civilly liable for any damages caused by the failure to report.5 Approximately 28 States carry penalties in their civil child protection laws for any person who willfully or intentionally makes a report of child abuse or neglect that the reporter knows to be false.6 In New York, Ohio, and the Virgin Islands, making false reports of child maltreatment is made illegal in criminal sections of State code

Whoever wrote this article is wrong. I guess you can legally review videos or pictures like this, but it's illegal to fail to report them.

- So what, some like to fuck dogs, & flirt with pussies "CATS"........  >

- Can we globalize it? ............ :-*

- Yeh, If you vote for me me me ............ :

[naive]

Anyone looking for a roommate in NY?

j/k, j/k

There is probably a strong correlation between abusing children and viewing child porn, but I deny that viewing child porn necessarily increases the likelihood of abusing children in pedophiles. Without proper studies for all we know if child porn was instantly removed you could have thousands of pedophiles out on the streets looking for victims as opposed to getting what they need without leaving their homes or going near flesh and blood kids.

[Spartacus]

Without proper studies for all we know if child porn was instantly removed you could have thousands of pedophiles out on the streets looking for victims as opposed to getting what they need without leaving their homes or going near flesh and blood kids.

Requires more effort. I think they'd probably find something else to do.

Anyway 17 y/os, still considered a child or no?

legally yes, thye are not allowed to give consent. However, I lost my virginity when I was 16 and have many friends that lost their virginity between the ages of 15 and 17 so it really depends on the person

legally yes, thye are not allowed to give consent. However, I lost my virginity when I was 16 and have many friends that lost their virginity between the ages of 15 and 17 so it really depends on the person

Who was he? =)

it was himself.... his right hand.

[henry]

his name's shirley

Without proper studies for all we know if child porn was instantly removed you could have thousands of pedophiles out on the streets looking for victims as opposed to getting what they need without leaving their homes or going near flesh and blood kids.

Requires more effort. I think they'd probably find something else to do.

Anyway 17 y/os, still considered a child or no?

I think it can vary from 17 y/o to 17 y/o. Though in nearly all cases I'd say they'd be physically mature, but probably not intellectually mature.