Jun 26 2014, 03:19 AM
who says theres a disadvantage for high pinger....... I AM GONNA PROVE THEM WRONG! BEAT THIS SCORES OF MINE WITH THIS LATENCY AND FPS
![[Image: ip89c1.jpg]](http://i58.tinypic.com/ip89c1.jpg)
![[Image: 2nroww6.jpg]](http://i58.tinypic.com/2nroww6.jpg)
![[Image: k9bzur.jpg]](http://i59.tinypic.com/k9bzur.jpg)
![[Image: 315l7rn.jpg]](http://i57.tinypic.com/315l7rn.jpg)
![[Image: rsfok2.jpg]](http://i62.tinypic.com/rsfok2.jpg)
i always have more than 500 ping...... and IN SOME I HAVE 650 PING
![[Image: ip89c1.jpg]](http://i58.tinypic.com/ip89c1.jpg)
![[Image: 2nroww6.jpg]](http://i58.tinypic.com/2nroww6.jpg)
![[Image: k9bzur.jpg]](http://i59.tinypic.com/k9bzur.jpg)
![[Image: 315l7rn.jpg]](http://i57.tinypic.com/315l7rn.jpg)
![[Image: rsfok2.jpg]](http://i62.tinypic.com/rsfok2.jpg)
Double post
H0ok3r w A P3n1s™, post: 111721, member: 17690 Wrote:I don't get it. You have decent ping in most of those pics.I MASKED IT... SEE THE NET GRAPH ORIGINAL LATENCY ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT CORNER of each SCREENSHOTS ...DONT SEE THE SCORE BOARD PING... ITS FAKE
Double post
i always have more than 500 ping...... and IN SOME I HAVE 650 PING


![[-]](https://war-lords.net/forum/images/collapse.png)
![[Image: 984349_101.png]](http://wls.gameme.com/sig/984349_101.png)