Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Resolved  250 admin abuse
#7
(May 18 2016, 09:23 AM)diro550 Wrote: Jesse, you sound so nice here when you say all that stuff but in game, you are a troll... You team flash the people you dislike and also block them... Do not try to deny this. I know this is a different subject but just wanted to say that you are a two faced person.

And Gabe, the time that 250 switched the map was because no one wanted to play the map you chose. it was 9 against 1. Everyone said let's change the map or they were going to leave which would have made the pug dead.

Very nice derailment, iCheat.

It you could even possibly find a hint of footage of me trolling teamflashing like you allege I would be in awe because it doesn't exist. Until then I respectfully will be calling you out as a liar. And when I accidentally throw bad flashes half the time it is of detriment to myself, and if another gets hit by it I applogize. Teamflashes sometimes happen- but on the occasion I do it, it's trolling? Show me where. I will however not deny that I've blocked you (and only you) a grand total of two times (for what, less than 3 seconds?) on Strike once because of whatever we were bickering about, but it stops there, I have a clean record. Entirely clean besides these 6 seconds you have decided to nitpick in your post.

I think it is a bit in poor taste to have made the post that you did, and I'll tell you why.

One, it's off topic, like you yourself noted.

Two, the motivations behind it are clearly malicious, to discredit this thread I've made because presumably it is exposing the imperfections of one of your butt-buddies.

Three, you're making allegations that are unfounded and this is downright dishonest of you. You are lying about me in your post. I am somewhat insulted that you are describing me as two faced. Somewhat because I don't care much of whatever opinion you may have of me at this point after seeing the type of character you have, but at the same time made a bit uncomfortable by the fact that you're willing to use your (I assume) good name you have on here as an attempt to smear my name. That's pretty low of you to do.

Four- if any of that nonsense you have written was true, you or another admin would have punished me by now, hm? It is only brought to the table that I am a "teamflashing troll" when I have an important matter that needs to be discussed about an admin's abuse. When I join up on pugs I come to play, not do whatever you claim I do, end of story. Provide proof. You won't. You can't.

You are lying.

To continue replying to your derailment of this thread, if that was the case regarding the incident of 250 abusing his admin powers to change the map, if your claims of 9 of the 10 people not wanting to play then players should have subbed out and let the spectator subs play. Because I'm sure if there were any, they wouldn't mind taking the empty spots. I've never seen any other admin aggressively deny a captain their choice of map. And also we played that map 3 or 4 times this weekend and nobody had any problems with it after the first round passed.

And to be frank, the sour taste left in my mouth after the lie-filled first part of your post addressed to me really makes me lean towards what you've addressed to Gabe as also dishonest and/or flat out lying. Gabe wrote that pretty much immediately after the map switched, 250 reversed his decision. But you say that there was discussion, and that ALL 9 people except for Gabe said that they do not want to play and would leave the pug (gasp, I'm sure they wouldn't rejoin).

I am very tempted to quickly take a glance at the demo for this pug in question because I have a strong feeling that it would confirm you are bullshitting to once again discredit and smear people.

Good job making me waste my time with your dank post.

Messages In This Thread
250 admin abuse - by Jesse W. - May 18 2016, 12:51 AM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by gabe. - May 18 2016, 04:34 AM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Jesse W. - May 18 2016, 04:38 AM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Riser - May 18 2016, 05:49 AM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Jesse W. - May 20 2016, 06:56 AM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Jesse W. - May 18 2016, 09:23 AM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Kobe - May 18 2016, 09:23 AM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Jesse W. - May 18 2016, 10:50 AM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by gabe. - May 18 2016, 03:28 PM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Kobe - May 18 2016, 06:32 PM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Jesse W. - May 18 2016, 09:12 PM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Kobe - May 19 2016, 12:29 AM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by kyonpyon - May 18 2016, 09:06 PM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Jesse W. - May 18 2016, 09:29 PM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by kahoobb - May 18 2016, 10:09 PM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Jesse W. - May 18 2016, 10:43 PM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Jesse W. - May 19 2016, 12:37 AM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by 250 - May 20 2016, 10:39 AM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Jesse W. - May 20 2016, 11:35 AM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by Jesse W. - May 20 2016, 12:13 PM
RE: 250 admin abuse - by M. Bison - May 20 2016, 12:21 PM

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)