Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Banned  w1red cheating
#6
(May 15 2019, 03:44 AM)ЯЭy Wrote:
(May 15 2019, 02:04 AM)W1red Wrote:
(May 15 2019, 02:01 AM)ЯЭy Wrote:
(May 15 2019, 01:58 AM)W1red Wrote: Ok, for one, the game ban is from Aimbot and ESP for PUBG. (Shout out to my boy with the BEService bypass ;^) )
number two, I did used to cheat, and I do not anymore. I've stopped cheating a long time ago.

This thread isn't just about your past cheating history. I just added it as more evidence to the pile. I reviewed one of your demos on wl and after only a few minutes it's clear you cheat in wl too bud. Re-read the OP.

ok, Idk if you're just slow or what, but, I've been playing CS eons longer than you. I literally grew up on an AOL 9.0 disc. Please don't @ me.

This isn't relevant nor is it going to save you.

In other news I made a quick video showcasing the above demo. I go on to explain how we can prove that he is cheating in the demo for admins that maybe haven't played around with cs cheats before.



tl;dr: He presses his aimkey, it sets his view angles that get sent to the server to the position of jersey's chest, it fires, kills jersey, and then after jersey is killed his view angles that get sent to the server default back to the view angles on his client which never moved. His crosshair on his screen never changes position. Hopefully you understand now if you didn't before.
For starters, silent-aim doesn't aim back at the original position of the player after they've been killed. I wouldn't be locking onto anything (including the original position of the dead player) at all if I were to use silent-aim. I like and can appreciate that you took the time to show your evidence. However, there would be no functioning aim-key if silent-aim were to be enabled, as there would be no point for it. The whole point of,"silent-aim", is that you don't have to aim, by your definition of it. Also, what is your tick-rate on launch of hl2.exe, what tick-rate are you viewing the demo in, and what is the tick-rate of the demo itself? All of that is pretty crucial information when trying to determine whether someone is cheating or not, correct? Nice attempt though.
(P.S. please don't copy and paste a C++ segment if you don't know anything about it. I could tell when you had to correct what you typed in the source-file post-recording with on-screen text.)

Messages In This Thread
w1red cheating - by ЯЭy - May 15 2019, 01:54 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by W1red - May 15 2019, 01:58 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by ЯЭy - May 15 2019, 02:01 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by W1red - May 15 2019, 02:04 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by ЯЭy - May 15 2019, 03:44 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by W1red - May 15 2019, 07:22 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by ЯЭy - May 15 2019, 08:15 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by W1red - May 15 2019, 08:48 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by ЯЭy - May 15 2019, 08:52 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by W1red - May 15 2019, 08:59 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by ЯЭy - May 15 2019, 09:01 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by W1red - May 15 2019, 09:03 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by ЯЭy - May 15 2019, 09:06 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by W1red - May 15 2019, 09:11 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by ЯЭy - May 15 2019, 09:12 AM
RE: w1red cheating - by Ben- - May 15 2019, 05:42 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)