You make little sense. The points I provided are facts, there is no opinion about it. Research the designer of the dollar bill, you will see the facts for yourself. Research the Latin, you will find the same translations that I found. My basis for those translations is from texts predating 1776 by 1,800 years, if not more. The All Seeing Eye (or the Eye of Providence) is an icon that has been used throughout history from 3,000 BC.

You can stretch pretty much anything to fit your own scenarios. Do you also believe that because you can fold a dollar bill to depict what seems to be two skyscrapers burning, that the attacks on the World Trade Center were planned attacks by the American government? Or even by the Illuminati, as you seem to believe that they have such massive control over the look of the currency of one of the largest countries on the planet.

This man Fritz Springmeier is a crazed right wing enthusiast and a borderline terrorist. His beliefs and accusations hang by the merest of threads, and can not be proven, even in the slightest. The fact that he belongs to a group called "The Army of God" is enough evidence to not believe the man, a group in which they themselves are defined as a "right wing terrorist Christian anti abortion group". A group which involves members that nailbomb abortion clinics and gay friendly bars, and Fritz himself sent a bomb to an adult video store in the early 2000's. A man who believes that the CIA has a mind control project, and his only conjecture being that of a testimony by a woman claiming to have been under a secret CIA initiative named "Project MKUltra" (a project in which people are apparently mind controlled through the use of LSD and flashing strobes).

All I can prove is that I am in denial of the truth? No, I look for reason behind conspiracy theories. I, for one, am a massive believer that 9/11 was orchestrated by the American government as a way of justifying their actions of going to war in Afghanistan and Iraq (the same tactic was used by Adolf Hitler for justifying his invasion of Poland in 1939, as he had an agent burn down the German Houses of Parliament). But I believe those because there is solid facts and science behind those theories (such as the high amount of industrial strength thermite being found at the scene of the attack, as well as evidence provided by several major achitects that both towers could fully withstand the impact of a 747 and not collapse in a matter of seconds).

I believe in science and facts, not ridiculous theories with literally nothing backing them. I think you are the one that needs to read about what they believe, as I obviously know more than you do, and you are the one that is supposed to be the believer. It's all very well to say that you know stuff, but have you actually read more than what is published by the theorists? I am guessing not.

EternalReaper Wrote:Debate! Debate! Debate!

Yes, I do enjoy a debate, but I have a hard time putting across my point to someone who is so easily blinded by the glamour of conspiracy theories. I wish my opponent would read a little more into what he believes, as it would be a much better debate if he wasn't so ignorant to blatant facts. Good day , sir.