Anubis Wrote:From what I see here, this situation is a joke. What information isn't available here that would make this look like an intelligent conflict?

My summary of what I see here is that OwnageHN joined his preferred team (or possibly a random team, I can't tell from the information) and was banned for doing so.

I think you guys are getting way off topic. I have no idea what the cause for the ban was and there's certainly no additional information being introduced.


Edit:

I just discovered this in SourceBans:

Quote:Italy, ownage is hardly joining T's, I switched him to ct, because the game was really unbalanced and we started losing people. He reconnects and joins T again, I switch him back to ct, then the same thing over and over... I switched him 5 times and all 5 times he was waiting in spec till T will have available spot for him(it was stacked). Then I did vote "ban ownage for 1 hour for team stacking?" and received 25 yes vs 5 no, because all players have seen me switching him 5 times... This guy's always stacking teams with a few others.

I have to ask the question: why don't you just move someone else to balance the teams rather than flood users with team switching messages? Also, I can't imagine how horribly unbalanced the game must have been if only one player could give the T's a 100% win ratio, but not give CT's a 100% win ratio when moved over. What is going on here?

This is starting to make some sense, but I do think this has been blown way out of proportion.

I think the main problem here is people always wanting to join the winning team... and when Admins, take action to even the teams, players try to rebel, and rejoin the game, or rejoin the stacked team.