Loks Wrote:I wasnt saying you reported dangerdavis! I was saying about ruplyer report and the comment you made after dangerdavis post what he thinks about ruplyer! So whathever im gonna stick with the report and stop arguin with you about irrelevant thing!
I truly belive Mr.Tea is experencied to know when someone is trying to do or not the objective! Im gonna stick with joker comment and if that was the case a slay is valid! If he wasnt even trying to provide cover with his awp to hes temmates to try to move forward and just camp til the round end then a slay is the fair thing he could do!!!

I didn't say you were saying that I reported DangerDavis.  This is another point of why you should stay out of this thread if you cannot interpret English correctly.  You evidently also do not understand the situation after reading your reasoning for why a "slay was valid."  Please stay out of this thread if you cannot appropriately contribute to it.