bSprout Wrote:Okay, if you don't agree with legit-proof, which is perfectly reasonable. Then explain to me why he was banned from very popular communities. HELLSGAMERS EVEN HAS THEIR OWN ESEA MAIN TEAM. SiX was very popular. Lotus is another community up there. If you really don't think this is suspicious...

You also mentioned that its somewhat okay to ban if other admins agree. What do admins have? a good education about how cheats work. Speedy is pro, has good education about how cheats work. Helmut is pro, he was even commended by bison that he had a good idea of how cheats work, it was only his trolling problem. I've had a 100% ban accuracy, all with demos, and this is the one time I didn't.  Takeda is somewhat decent, and even he agreed that keek was cheating.

These 4, what makes them different, if not better, than our admins in catching cheats?

The beauty about banning is proof to the ban.  Hence why there is an admin appeal in the forums.  A lot of SiX banned players play here.  A lot of SiX non-banned players play here and your pros say they hack.  Failsafe to proving hacks is demo.

When I banned Always Angry.  I got a lot of heat from players in-game because "good" players that were "hackish" were still aloud to play.  I explained to them no proof=no hack. 

I've played CSS 750+hrs more than your pros.  +2000 more than you.  I must be playing with my eyes closed.