Aug 28 2011, 04:32 PM
I guess that's a no then.
If you are unable to demo someone, then you have no right to ban them. Were any of the other 3 people you were with wL admins? I am guessing no.
Another thing is, this was in a scrim? If it was in a pub, I would have a bit more understanding for you, but it was in a server with 9 other people in. It's hardly like he was running riot in a 42 man server.
You even said yourself :
So why didn't you bide your time, get some evidence and then ban him? Silly.
You are right there. But as it was a wL scrim server, we would expect that no one would dare to hack in a server that's populated by server admins.
I have asked about SourceTV demos in the scrim servers, but it's not exactly priority at the moment.
If you are unable to demo someone, then you have no right to ban them. Were any of the other 3 people you were with wL admins? I am guessing no.
Another thing is, this was in a scrim? If it was in a pub, I would have a bit more understanding for you, but it was in a server with 9 other people in. It's hardly like he was running riot in a 42 man server.
You even said yourself :
Quote:Keek is online in the evening hours most days on Popular server #2. If you need a demo on him aimbotting that would be a good time.
So why didn't you bide your time, get some evidence and then ban him? Silly.
helmut^ Wrote:I agree however, that nobody should be banned without a demo. Seeing as this was on the wL scrim server though, you guys should have source tv set to automatically record. add "tv_enable 1" and "tv_autorecord 1" to the server.cfg.
You are right there. But as it was a wL scrim server, we would expect that no one would dare to hack in a server that's populated by server admins.
I have asked about SourceTV demos in the scrim servers, but it's not exactly priority at the moment.
If you read this, you suck.