ruplayer Wrote:

Mr.Tea Wrote:How would I be jelly if I don't even like it?  Strange logic there.

He's silly, don't look for logic there...

Pfft, first of all I had not presented a new statement, but instead merely restated what had already been said by ptk. Secondly, tea, you've demonstrated an equivocation fallacy (regarding your seemingly intentional exchange of the two meanings of "jelly"), which is ironically an illogical action itself.

In addition, even if I were to follow your invalid logic, is it necessary for someone to like death in order for them to become dead? No, they usually don't have a choice in the matter.

Moreover, ruplayer, here are just some of the logical fallacies apparent in that one sentence you wrote: Ad hominem (or more specifically, poisoning the well) [a type of ad hominem where adverse information about a target is presented with the intention of discrediting everything that the target person says], Appeal to ridicule (an argument is made by presenting the opponent's argument in a way that makes it appear ridiculous), and probably argumentum ex silentio (a conclusion based on silence of the opponent or lack of contrary evidence).

Karma ;D