Mr.Tea Wrote:Silly, again you try to make presumptions that I have already given you the answers too.

Evidence?

Mr.Tea Wrote:Unfortunately, I am much older than you and have my undergraduate and on my way to finishing a masters. 

First of all, you've just provided an example of the "appeal to accomplishment" fallacy (where the perceived validity of an argument is based upon the accomplishments of the proposer).

Also, I stated that I was 22 because you called me son (incidentally an example of the "judgmental language" fallacy), and I made clear that I had knowledge of logical fallacies not because I was being pretentious, but because you made out like I did not understand the straightforward logic involved in my posts.

Mr.Tea Wrote:When I went to school philosophy was a general education choice and you learn an important note.

If you chose this subject, you mustn't have been paying much attention. 

Mr.Tea Wrote:philosophy is semantics and other bullshit.

Semantics is a branch of philosophy, but does not in any way represent all philosophy. If you truly believe your statement, then I doubt you'd be aware of even 10% of what philosophy is even about.

Mr.Tea Wrote:My trolling has been successful.  trololol.

Sure, if that's what you call riddling your last two posts with misconceptions and logical errors, then making attempts to defend yourself while acting like you're not at all serious.

Spartacus Wrote:Lesson Learnt:
If you take things seriously in the internet, you have failed.

You've just created a paradox. Your post is on the internet, so I shouldn't take it seriously, hence I should take things on the internet seriously, etc.

But really, the internet is simply a medium for communication (yet a rather unemotional one at that). Some things should be taken seriously, some not. Often it's hard to tell which is which.