Dec 26 2011, 11:13 PM
You seriously don't get the point of Innocent until proven guilty do you.
Without any proof of him hacking, since you didn't supply any, he doesn't need to post anything. GJ on logical reasoning, you'd def. fail that part of the LSAT.
Pretty sure Boon and I don't talk and he didn't ask me to defend him. I'm simply following the rules for admins and stating that you have no proof and that your claims are illogical. Which they are.
Without any proof of him hacking, since you didn't supply any, he doesn't need to post anything. GJ on logical reasoning, you'd def. fail that part of the LSAT.
Pretty sure Boon and I don't talk and he didn't ask me to defend him. I'm simply following the rules for admins and stating that you have no proof and that your claims are illogical. Which they are.