Registry Wrote:

joker8baller Wrote:No point of clearing dirt on your name with every attack as well.

Especially when attacks are made without justification or proof. It's not like the President responds to every negative thing said about him.

lmao...The President?..really?

Clinton responded when accused...might have been full of shit...be he responded

just sayin

a public defender is the best you would ever do...getting poor people to take deals...because any other setting you would lose

Ah yes, insults.

Can I try my hand? What do you do? Work at McDonald's? You do have a job right? See what I did there? Was it effective? No.

Clinton did not respond to every accusation that made against him, especially those simply made because they were mad. Yes, he responded to the Monica Lewinsky case, but in that instance EVIDENCE was produced against him, not random speculation by someone who was mad. There's a distinct difference, and if you can't understand that, then you probably don't have a job (See what I did there? Was it effective? Is it true? Exactly.)

Tea, you might want to refer him to a logical reasoning school as well.