Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST?
#39
Re: DOES THIS RULE EXIST?

Dragon Wrote:But i think the main objective of the ct's is to protect the bomb sites.....and they are doing that by camping 
and t's have to rush to bomb sites that's their objective.
i think you got owned by red's awp...,.
Lol
Bloodlust Hero Wrote:The objective makes perfect sense, even in real life.. if those were your only options, obviously camping won't stop the Ts.
like i said before...
and blood if ur looking at it like that then u should have noticed that ct's and t's should go kill each others but not just ct's rush and t's camp and kill them..
because on pop maps or other maps t's job is to to rush and plant the bomb and ct's job is to camp and defuse it or t's should protect hosties and ct's should rush and rescue them.
but on this map there is no bomb or hosties which means t's + ct's = same objective(rushing)
and i only camp down cuz of those who jump a big nasty jump and land on the window and kill ct's from the back! (cowerds)
but on this map there is no bomb
...

Messages In This Thread
(SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Nov 06 2011, 05:44 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by JayCat - Nov 06 2011, 05:47 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Nov 06 2011, 05:52 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by JayCat - Nov 06 2011, 06:46 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by FenKeN - Nov 06 2011, 07:14 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Nov 06 2011, 07:40 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by pTK - Nov 06 2011, 09:13 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by 360Oreo - Nov 06 2011, 09:21 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by JayCat - Nov 09 2011, 06:26 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 06 2012, 11:23 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 06 2012, 11:34 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 06 2012, 11:51 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by Dragon - Jan 07 2012, 12:14 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by TheBoss - Jan 07 2012, 12:15 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 12:16 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 12:24 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by RED7EAGLE - Jan 07 2012, 12:28 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 12:36 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 12:48 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by pTK - Jan 07 2012, 12:54 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 01:00 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 01:07 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 01:51 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 02:45 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by TheBoss - Jan 07 2012, 12:18 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by Riser - Jan 07 2012, 08:57 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 08 2012, 01:22 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Feb 06 2012, 02:30 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Feb 06 2012, 02:59 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by }{@K@P - Feb 07 2012, 04:19 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by naive - Feb 07 2012, 08:33 PM

Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)