Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST?
#55
Re: DOES THIS RULE EXIST?

Both of you are correct/wrong, The objective is OBVIOUSLY CT has to infiltrate the building and kill all the t's before the nuke launch, it's really obvious that this is the objective... but since there is no proof of that, there's not really a objective ( didn't know how to say it lol ),i honestly think the t's would rush if there wasn't peoples camping outside, EVERY rounds. Look at me for example, i always jump out and try to rush but since there's 5 awpers camping outside every rounds, i don't do it anymore... also, i do agree with blood that ct camping outside and just waiting the whole time is gay because as soon as the t's look outside the tower, they get killed by an awper, so the only thing that t's can do is, camping in the tower or camping on the roof waiting for ct's to come up. also, i agree that whoever is camping outside with an awp the whole round, should get slapped then slayed.

to conclude, i'm with both sides, like i said you are both correct and wrong.

This was my first post and last about this fight, this is completly stupid and useless,
P.S : i had more things to say, but blood and red7eagle were talking to me on steam at the same time so i lost all my ideas lol...
[Image: 34grqxg.png]
[Image: 168hp2u.png]


Messages In This Thread
(SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Nov 06 2011, 05:44 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by JayCat - Nov 06 2011, 05:47 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Nov 06 2011, 05:52 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by JayCat - Nov 06 2011, 06:46 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by FenKeN - Nov 06 2011, 07:14 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Nov 06 2011, 07:40 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by pTK - Nov 06 2011, 09:13 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by 360Oreo - Nov 06 2011, 09:21 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by JayCat - Nov 09 2011, 06:26 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 06 2012, 11:23 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 06 2012, 11:34 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 06 2012, 11:51 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by Dragon - Jan 07 2012, 12:14 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by TheBoss - Jan 07 2012, 12:15 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 12:16 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 12:24 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 12:36 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 12:48 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by pTK - Jan 07 2012, 12:54 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 01:00 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 01:07 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by Cas Beep Beep Im A Jeep - Jan 07 2012, 01:51 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 01:51 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 02:45 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by TheBoss - Jan 07 2012, 12:18 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by Riser - Jan 07 2012, 08:57 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 08 2012, 01:22 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Feb 06 2012, 02:30 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Feb 06 2012, 02:59 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by }{@K@P - Feb 07 2012, 04:19 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by naive - Feb 07 2012, 08:33 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)