Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST?
#61
Re: DOES THIS RULE EXIST?

Cas Beep Beep Im A Jeep Wrote:
DRUNK_KILLER Wrote:
Bloodlust Hero Wrote:Not true, almost all CTs will always rush. It's most you, Icebird, and some others that refuse to do anything except camp. On occasion some other players will camp as well. Drunk threatens to report me when I slay him for camping forever. Lmao.
yes i did, because u are always slaying me or some other guys.. why dont u slay whos playing in your teeam? or why dont u try to make this change with the players while in game..
Cas Beep Beep Im A Jeep Wrote:Both of you are correct/wrong, The objective is OBVIOUSLY CT has to infiltrate the building and kill all the t's before the nuke launch, it's really obvious that this is the objective... but since there is no proof of that, there's not really a objective ( didn't know how to say it lol ),i honestly think the t's would rush if there wasn't peoples camping outside, EVERY rounds. Look at me for example, i always jump out and try to rush but since there's 5 awpers camping outside every rounds, i don't do it anymore... also, i do agree with blood that ct camping outside and just waiting the whole time is gay because as soon as the t's look outside the tower, they get killed by an awper, so the only thing that t's can do is, camping in the tower or camping on the roof waiting for ct's to come up. also, i agree that whoever is camping outside with an awp the whole round, should get slapped then slayed.

to conclude, i'm with both sides, like i said you are both correct and wrong.

This was my first post and last about this fight, this is completly stupid and useless,
P.S : i had more things to say, but blood and red7eagle were talking to me on steam at the same time so i lost all my ideas lol...
cts try to go up, and get headshoted for some dumbass that appears on the window, or an awper..

thanks for pointing that out, this is actually why i said i am on both side ( basicly, i'm being neutral), watch i'll create the same sentence u made but with the t's

: T's try to go down, and get headshoted by some dumbass camping the elevator room or the vent, or an awper camping outside,

see, this is why i said i,m on both side, because both of you are complaining about the same thing, one is talking about ct's ( u and red7 ), blood and assassin are talking about t's,
RED7EAGLE Wrote:u know what i think it's best if u guys just REMOVE this dam map...

i was thinking about that aswell but then i checked gameMe map stats

1st place : mg_smee_tower_fix2 8d 13:30:36h

2nd place : mg_warmcup_headshot 4d 04:21:03h

smee is the most popular map by far, removing it would just be an terrible idea...
the only thing we have to do is find something reasonable for both sides...
1. mg_smee_tower_fix2 8d 13:30:36h
2. mg_ski_mountain 6d 22:54:54h
3. mg_warmcup_headshot 4d 04:21:03h
4. mg_n64_goldeneye_v2 4d 03:19:53h
5. mg_all_in_one_sg_xivz_fix    2d 21:21:20h
-FIXED-
[Image: trofeu1-150x150.jpg]to smee,
so lets leave things the way they are, like every1 plays the way u like and just add 2 minutes nuke killing everyone, team has + players is the winner.
[Image: 1UH9a8H.png]



[Image: 5pfuEDP.gif]

Messages In This Thread
(SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Nov 06 2011, 05:44 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by JayCat - Nov 06 2011, 05:47 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Nov 06 2011, 05:52 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by JayCat - Nov 06 2011, 06:46 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by FenKeN - Nov 06 2011, 07:14 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Nov 06 2011, 07:40 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by pTK - Nov 06 2011, 09:13 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by 360Oreo - Nov 06 2011, 09:21 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by JayCat - Nov 09 2011, 06:26 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 06 2012, 11:23 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 06 2012, 11:34 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 06 2012, 11:51 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by Dragon - Jan 07 2012, 12:14 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by TheBoss - Jan 07 2012, 12:15 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 12:16 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 12:24 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 12:36 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 12:48 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by pTK - Jan 07 2012, 12:54 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 01:00 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 01:07 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 01:51 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 07 2012, 02:45 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by TheBoss - Jan 07 2012, 12:18 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by Riser - Jan 07 2012, 08:57 PM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Jan 08 2012, 01:22 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Feb 06 2012, 02:30 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by DK - Feb 06 2012, 02:59 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by }{@K@P - Feb 07 2012, 04:19 AM
RE: (SMEE_TOWER) DOES THIS RULE EXIST? - by naive - Feb 07 2012, 08:33 PM

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)