Just making this thread because I can't reply to the other one.

Maybe I'm more libertarian than I thought.

For the sake of support, I'd just like to say that agree with lautaro. For all of those people saying that lautaro did the wrong thing by disregarding what an admin had decided, what is so wrong about doing that? If an admin told you to jump off a cliff, should you obey? Just because an admin says or does something, does not make it automatically right, or okay.

If anything, someone should only get into trouble for not following a rule which was demonstrably justifiable. But, I don't think what ruplayer did was completely justified. The teams were stacked on mill, however slight you may think they were. It's not clear how stacked they were on nuke, but I'm going to assume they were more stacked.

Ruplayer seemed to have been inconsistent with his "unstacking", and on this occasion only "unstacked" when it appeared to be beneficial for himself.

I think it's obvious that Lautaro continued to change back, because he felt it was unfair for ruplayer to repeatedly change him without his free-will and consent.