Thanks mindhax, yeah that's why I posted it here.

Naive, what you said is very persuasive, but I personally think that the "ignoring admins" rule should be changed into "ignoring justified rule". The "ignoring admins" rule isn't one that I have come across before in the large css communities, it gives admins more authority to abuse their position of power.

Is it just a coincidence that many people are posting abuse threads about these types of things? I don't think so. These people don't think it is fair, and I tend to agree.

Also, I understand what you mean about subjectivity, but stacked simply means significantly imbalanced teams, and it was clear that the teams were significantly imbalanced on mill, hence I don't think he was consistent.

Ruplayer, not all of your "abuse threads" were like this. For instance: in one you were accused of abuse for kicking someone to "remove their nomination".
Oh, and, haters gonna create haters hahaha. But I don't hate you, I just dislike some things that you do.

Also, why are there a disproportionate amount of admin abuse threads directed at ruplayer... Is that a coincidence also?