silly Wrote:

JackMonroe Wrote:

silly Wrote:In MW, there's a greater potential for some players to be better than others, compared to CSS; a potentially greater skill difference.

That is so very false.  The game is easy to start and easy to master.  During the free weekend of black ops on steam, I got to the cap of 30 in hours and got called a hacker at least 10 times.  Back in COD4 I played in scrims and pooped on everybody and again got called a hacker over and over.  That is with me just picking the game up on the side.

You genuinely did not undestand the point I was making  :-\
In CSS (especially since the OB update), there is an overall lesser potential difference in skill between players. In other words, there are more limitations on how good a player can get, relative to other players.
It is easier for a talented fps gamer to get extremely good at MW games, relative to the other fps gamers. There's more room and less limitations for that to happen. I was on average, much better at MW2 relative to the other players, compared to in CSS. I have also noticed that with many other players.

That is what silly was talking. Talented players such as yourself become extremely good in CoD in such so little time.

http://www.ckras-gaming.com/squads/index/35

I couldn't believe that CoD still have some competitive players lol.