[lin3ar]

Failure to complete or clearly make an attempt to do objective as CT results in a slay. "Clearly make an attempt" include the following, but are not limited to these scenarios:

1. Outnumbered CTs attempt to take projector room with Ts camping it while there is sufficient time on the clock, fall back because of low hp and superior numbers (camping a position outside with no visible attempt to enter projector room does not qualify as attempting objective)
2. CTs have hostages and are making it back to spawn when CT leading hostages is killed in a position where Ts can easily camp the position out, making retrieval of the hostages very difficult. As long as CTs demonstrate that they have attempted to kill the Ts in the area or risk retrieving the hostages, it qualifies as an attempt (camping near hostages the whole time does not qualify as an attempt)
3. CT does a tactical save with an awp (or any rifle when CT is losing badly against T) while having demonstrated that he/she has at least made some effort to engage Ts and kill them during the round. (CTs who have been shown to camp with awp several times as last CT(s) and/or in certain spots such as long snipe do not qualify as making an effort, also note that this is permissible every once in a while as the losing team is designed to be given more cash, up to the point of $6000 starting round)

I'm going to guess that the players who were slayed delayed attempting objective until it was impossible to rescue the hostages in the amount of time left. According to a chat between Bison and me, Bison confirmed that it is justified to slay a CT who does not attempt the rescue until the amount of time remaining makes rescue or victory impossible. It does not matter if the players are "new" to the game. Being new or bad at this game does not exempt one from the rules. We are here to enforce the rules across everyone, not try to determine "how bad" the players are at the game and whether or not they should be slayed.

If you were constantly criticizing the actions of another admin, I suppose it can be construed as trying to interfere with the admin's judgment. It does come across that you are somewhat trying to antagonize the admin regarding his decision. Whether or not your kick was justified is something I'm not going to take a stance on until more details are revealed.