C programming failed...

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Leaky

The Goddamn Batman

Posts: 319
Threads: 19
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 0

ID Unlinked

Dec 24 2012, 03:41 PM

#20

GAHHH CHANGE THE 500*100 TO JUST BE 5!

per=(m1+m2+m3+m4+m5)/5;

that was said like 2 times in this thread then you kept going and making it more and more complicated. the /5 is all you need. why were you doing 500 in the first place?

Find

View a Printable Version

Messages In This Thread

C programming failed... - by Danger255 - Nov 27 2012, 12:40 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Spartacus - Nov 27 2012, 12:43 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Danger255 - Nov 27 2012, 12:46 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Spartacus - Nov 27 2012, 12:57 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Danger255 - Nov 27 2012, 02:26 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Spartacus - Nov 27 2012, 03:23 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Danger255 - Nov 28 2012, 12:47 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by M. Bison - Nov 28 2012, 01:48 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Spartacus - Nov 28 2012, 02:29 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Dr. gkovr - Nov 28 2012, 07:18 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Danger255 - Nov 29 2012, 12:23 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by M. Bison - Nov 29 2012, 01:38 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Spartacus - Nov 29 2012, 02:40 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Danger255 - Dec 01 2012, 10:25 AM

RE: C programming failed... - by M. Bison - Dec 03 2012, 04:07 AM

RE: C programming failed... - by Dr. gkovr - Dec 03 2012, 04:41 AM

RE: C programming failed... - by Danger255 - Dec 03 2012, 01:39 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Spartacus - Dec 03 2012, 02:49 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Danger255 - Dec 06 2012, 12:33 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Leaky - Dec 24 2012, 03:41 PM

RE: C programming failed... - by Danger255 - Dec 24 2012, 03:43 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)