Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why is Boston 'terrorism' but not Aurora, Sandy Hook, Tucson and Columbine?
#5
Spartacus, post: 90732, member: 1060 Wrote:I agree that in all cases it should be said that all of them were an act of terror. However, most of the time in the shooting cases, mainstream media portrayed the gunmen as a deranged lunatic (sometimes suffering from depression or other social illnesses) instead of someone who did it out of "ideological goals"/"terrorist". Anyone who targets the innocent are all deranged lunatics if you asked me. It is semantics but the outcome/effects from those events differ and matter greatly.



http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2013/04/2....html?_r=0


Anyway, I don't know what to believe in the news anymore. Innocent people were killed, just not sure whether justice would prevail. Need more uplifting news.

Lets just say if Russia decided to invade Chechnya, I am sure the US public will be ok looking away! xD
[Image: 61kfgjqll7.jpg]
[Image: cucubelu2.jpg]
[Image: 801768_101.png]
Former Stargate Worlds International Moderator