Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Suggestion for flamez.
#1
It would be nice if we can apply 17+ rule for flamez section and mark names of the threads, for example "I hate spartan[flamez]" or "I hate spartan[M]", where M is MATURE.
Quote:MATURE
Titles rated M (Mature) have content that may be suitable for persons ages 17 and older. Titles in this category may contain intense violence, blood and gore, sexual content, and/or strong language.
[Image: a0900e6a-0277-4683-bd54-1103f9b81cae.GIF?v=1#eim-M.GIF]
I know that some young fellows probably don't care about it and will still click on it, but you never know maybe some people don't want to browse flamez therads, and they aren't marked when you look at Recent Topics. It also makes some users think they can use strong language and same flamez behaviors everywhere on forums.

Please move to suggestions section, I changed my mind.
#2
Re: ruplayer flamez admin

No.
This should be obvious to people that they should NOT post pornography or extreme abusive language.
pTK Wrote:Never a cheater, but could be a cheater, Once a cheater, less likely legiter. Ruplayer you bitter, You gotta admit everyone's a commiter.
#3
Re: ruplayer flamez admin

fenken Wrote:No.
This should be obvious to people that they should NOT post pornography or extreme abusive language.
Check your PM.
#4
Well I guess this section should rated M already.

P.S: shouldnt it be at the age of 18,not 17?
#5
BaNaNaMaN Wrote:Well I guess this section should rated M already.

P.S: shouldnt it be at the age of 18,not 17?
For games and movies it's 17...
#6
ruplayer Wrote:
BaNaNaMaN Wrote:Well I guess this section should rated M already.

P.S: shouldnt it be at the age of 18,not 17?
For games and movies it's 17...

In England our film ratings go U, PG, 12 (12A in cinemas), 15 and 18.
If you read this, you suck.
#7
Eternal Wrote:
BaNaNaMaN Wrote:Well I guess this section should rated M already.

P.S: shouldnt it be at the age of 18,not 17?

No flaming in non flame sections.

Actually he responded to fenken's post, somehow fenken's post got removed but bananaman's post not, so it's not his fault.
#8
I see, well problem solved.
(° ‿ ° ✿)

[Image: EternalReaper.png]
[Image: 2hmjw44.png]


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)