[cucubelu]

I have no idea about this. But, well... Some of your troops don't agree about this.



There are really funny things about democracy… I don't think using the edge of canon to solve problem is such a good idea.
U.S. bombed us the fuck back to Stone Age during the Cold War and led our country into 5 years-civil war and 2003 invasion of Iraq, 2011 Libya also and It's something you should learn about.

The rest of the world looks the other way regarding WMDs, and nobody cares that tens of thousand civilians die. This is chemical warfare, we are talking about, where civilians targets stand no chance in protecting themselves. Civil war you are talking about is one thing, but when a madman uses his restricted WMD arsenal to target his population than by God you are stupid to compare Libya or the Invasion of Iraq to this current crisis.

Learn your history of chemical warfare, and why its banned, and why allowing a country as Syria could lead to other countries taking example. If there is no-one to stop them from using it, what stop measures are there for other countries who are on the verge of Civili war. How about Egypt?

US needs a precision strike against military targets, just as Obama said he would do if it led to that. He said no boots on the ground operation, which by definition rules out invasion (again your comparison is wrong).

These men and women who serve one of the greatest world military powers should be ashamed not to think about the future consequences not having a military strike against Syria will do. Chemical warfare becoming more common? Do we really want to see that happen? While NATO and UN fiddle themselves in the arse and do nothing ?