Still unswayed.  Vote strongly No. 

Team balance because one person uses an AWP doesn't make sense.  So, the other 19players on the team stacked it because they wanted to awp?  And they don't switch teams because they don't want to get killed by the better awper?  Trying to follow the logic.  Look at any italy/aztec/dust map that is stacked.  Top 5 players on winning team have a ridiculous score usually only one of them has an awp.  Most of the time I'm not killed by an AWP on these map its by an AK/M4.

ruplayer Wrote:voted yes, some people just can't play without awp, will have them learn some other weapons.

Most people that awp well can use other weapons. 

M. Bison Wrote:I've updated my initial post with all of my reasoning. It seems no one seems to understand what I'm saying.

http://war-lords.net/cs-suggestions/1-a ... /#msg18993

Nada 2 awp to the losing team would encourage more switching.

Still think the issue is team balancing and money to the losing team after losing 3 rnds consistently. 

My favorite server a few years ago had no awp restriction, block on, and FF on.  Functioned very well, had good players (40ppl map too), and wasn't just giant awp wars.  They had auto team balance and 4k to the losing team after 3 consecutive rounds.