SHOULDN'T BE BANNED?

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Expired SHOULDN'T BE BANNED?

i cri everytiem

Posting Freak

Posts: 4,510
Threads: 424
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 3

ID STEAM_0:1:46495458

Steam PUG Bans

Jan 19 2012, 04:40 AM

M. Bison Wrote:No, of course not, but banned users are handled that way by default. This shouldn't really matter since they aren't able to do anything. And no, they can't even command spam either.

http://wls.gameme.com/player_histories/chat/340636 ok.. if u said so..
and tanks for replying, i just wanted to make sure that rules are running to this player! thanks

Find

View a Printable Version

Messages In This Thread

SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - by DK - Jan 19 2012, 04:19 AM

RE: SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - by M. Bison - Jan 19 2012, 04:26 AM

RE: SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - by DK - Jan 19 2012, 04:27 AM

RE: SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - by M. Bison - Jan 19 2012, 04:35 AM

RE: SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - by DK - Jan 19 2012, 04:40 AM

RE: SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - by Bloodlust Hero - Jan 21 2012, 06:58 PM

RE: SHOULDN'T BE BANNED? - by DK - Jan 21 2012, 07:02 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)