Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ping these IP's
#1
Hi,

Could you guys please ping these IP's for me please?

67.220.206.1

173.231.20.18

216.144.225.250

Thanks!
#2
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6002]
Copyright © 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Users\granex>ping 67.220.206.1

Pinging 67.220.206.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=240
Request timed out.
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 67.220.206.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 268ms, Maximum = 274ms, Average = 271ms

C:\Users\granex>ping 173.231.20.18

Pinging 173.231.20.18 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=48
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=355ms TTL=48
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=207ms TTL=48
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 173.231.20.18:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 207ms, Maximum = 355ms, Average = 274ms

C:\Users\granex>ping 216.144.225.250

Pinging 216.144.225.250 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=351ms TTL=50
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=247ms TTL=50
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=50
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=277ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 216.144.225.250:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 200ms, Maximum = 351ms, Average = 268ms
[Image: 11bkoc6.png]
[Image: 2uiga3d.jpg]
[Image: bar.jpg]
#3
You have a lot of jitter.
#4
hehe im in the office right now..connection here sucks!!:p
[Image: 11bkoc6.png]
[Image: 2uiga3d.jpg]
[Image: bar.jpg]
#5
Pinging 67.220.206.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=277ms TTL=236
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=277ms TTL=236
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=362ms TTL=236
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=277ms TTL=236

Ping statistics for 67.220.206.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 277ms, Maximum = 362ms, Average = 298ms


Pinging 173.231.20.18 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=307ms TTL=44
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=306ms TTL=44
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=306ms TTL=44
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=306ms TTL=44

Ping statistics for 173.231.20.18:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 306ms, Maximum = 307ms, Average = 306ms



Pinging 216.144.225.250 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=291ms TTL=52
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=291ms TTL=52
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=291ms TTL=52
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=291ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 216.144.225.250:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 291ms, Maximum = 291ms, Average = 291ms
#6
Anybody else? I'm trying to compare networks here guys and see which one is better.
#7
i will post mine later tonight..i mean my home connection..Smile
[Image: 11bkoc6.png]
[Image: 2uiga3d.jpg]
[Image: bar.jpg]
#8
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright © 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Users\Aaron>ping 67.220.206.1

Pinging 67.220.206.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=240
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=240
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=240
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 67.220.206.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 42ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 43ms

C:\Users\Aaron>ping 173.231.20.18

Pinging 173.231.20.18 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=48
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=48
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=48
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 173.231.20.18:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 40ms, Maximum = 42ms, Average = 40ms

C:\Users\Aaron>ping 216.144.225.250

Pinging 216.144.225.250 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 216.144.225.250:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 40ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 42ms

C:\Users\Aaron>
(° ‿ ° ✿)

[Image: EternalReaper.png]
[Image: 2hmjw44.png]

#9
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600]
Copyright © 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Users\Kenny>ping 67.220.206.1

Pinging 67.220.206.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=243
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=243
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=243
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 67.220.206.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 21ms, Average = 20ms

C:\Users\Kenny>ping 173.231.20.18

Pinging 173.231.20.18 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=51
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 173.231.20.18:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 22ms, Average = 21ms

C:\Users\Kenny>ping 216.144.225.250

Pinging 216.144.225.250 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 216.144.225.250:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 20ms
[Image: scary-cat-100.jpg]
#10
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 67.220.206.1

Pinging 67.220.206.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=284ms TTL=225
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=291ms TTL=225
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=283ms TTL=225
Reply from 67.220.206.1: bytes=32 time=290ms TTL=225

Ping statistics for 67.220.206.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 283ms, Maximum = 291ms, Average = 287ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 173.231.20.18

Pinging 173.231.20.18 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=299ms TTL=33
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=33
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=295ms TTL=33
Reply from 173.231.20.18: bytes=32 time=286ms TTL=33

Ping statistics for 173.231.20.18:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 281ms, Maximum = 299ms, Average = 290ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 216.144.225.250

Pinging 216.144.225.250 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=351ms TTL=35
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=349ms TTL=35
Reply from 216.144.225.250: bytes=32 time=356ms TTL=35
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 216.144.225.250:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 349ms, Maximum = 356ms, Average = 352ms
[Image: Photo%20collage-climate%20scenarios-glob...k=rcowMNf5]

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)