Jul 28 2017, 01:12 AM
THE AMOUNT OF RAGEQUITS IS TOO DAMN HIGH
It has been for a while. Im sure we can all think of some names of players who do it.
There is absolutely no reprecussion for leaving a pug theses days. Sure there is the 1 day deterrent ban for leaving without a sub, but what about when there are subs and pugs become unbalanced?
People can leave a pug with decent stats after a couple rounds, say 10+ rws, and then more often than not pugs become unbalanced.
When will there be a real reprecussion for leaving a pug?
People have said that in ESEA when a player leaves a game before the match is over...the rest of the rounds played, that player recieves 0 rws (or something along the lines of that). How about implementing this ESEA rule, or whatever the actual rule is, to further deter players from leaving pugs. This would prevent pugs from becoming unbalanced sorta like how the veto https://war-lords.net/forum/thread-16833...light=veto would have prevented pugs from becoming unbalanced.
Maybe even institute ragequits as a stat, so we can see how often someone leaves a pug so we can shame them. Yes, RQ shaming.
Something needs to be done. It happens to often, and is annoying in a team based game.
Think about using that ESEA rule as well the shame stat, and/or post some of your other suggestions here.
sift