Jul 16 2012, 07:05 PM
When you
But when there are 4-5 picking mid, more people who lost the Awp previously are going to waste time trying to get the Awp. There are more chances and they are unable to buy it again next round... Or they want someone to die so they don't waste their one buy.
It's only one of the many arguements against it, and not the most persuasive but still a legitimate concern.
Dr. Ruplayer, post: 68017, member: 9168 Wrote:This was said too many times... I don't see how current system doesn't allow them to surround ONE AWPER per team, but it will allow them to surround 4-5 AWPERS PER TEAM with suggested system.When you limit a popular gun to 1, there can only be one... So 5 people don't typically fight over it. Thered only one to pick up so theyll typically wait till next round.
But when there are 4-5 picking mid, more people who lost the Awp previously are going to waste time trying to get the Awp. There are more chances and they are unable to buy it again next round... Or they want someone to die so they don't waste their one buy.
It's only one of the many arguements against it, and not the most persuasive but still a legitimate concern.