Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
#1
No way I'm getting both.

I've heard of some lag issues in multiplayer gameplay for both games. I'll set up a list of pros and cons for both games. Will keep on modifying it when inputs from other people come in.

Battlefield 3

Pros
More Realistic
More Strategic
More Teamwork
Ability to Pilot and drive various vehicles
Ability to destroy buildings
Less Asshats playing this game

Cons
Using an EA client(to each his own)
Singleplayer Storyline is lame
Like its predecessors, snipers class are in favor more than other classes

Modern Warfare 3

Pros
More Online Modes
Weapons and Player Levels are Independent of each other
Singleplayer Storyline is original

Cons
Killstreaks could be overpowered
Community have asshats in them
Details and weapons similar to predecessors

References
http://welcometonextgen.blogspot.com/201...are-3.html
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-5732...warfare-3/
be the best version of yourself, that's all you can do.
#2
You're better off ignoring both... They were both big hypes and were let downs... Imo, of course.
(° ‿ ° ✿)

[Image: EternalReaper.png]
[Image: 2hmjw44.png]

#3
You need to move this thread to flamez section, cuz it feels like we're a bit handcuffed here, especially with the name of the thread.

BF3 has co-op mode! RUSH/TDM/CONQUEST why do you need more?
You're wrong about Recon class.
[Image: blog.png]
Screen from Battlelog.


I own BF3, and I think MW3 is the same old shit. 60$ map pack for MW2.
#4
Spartacus Wrote:Battlefield 3

Pros
Less Asshats playing this game
I refute these claims.
Steam Wrote: 4:02 PM - George, of the jungle: was out
4:02 PM - George, of the jungle: bison, dude
4:02 PM - Brawl Bashin’ Bison: ???
4:02 PM - George, of the jungle: you're very rude towards alina
4:02 PM - George, of the jungle: how about unbanning her friend?
4:02 PM - George, of the jungle: I mean
4:02 PM - George, of the jungle: it's only gamebanana skins
4:02 PM - Brawl Bashin’ Bison: LOL
4:02 PM - George, of the jungle: ^^
4:02 PM - Brawl Bashin’ Bison: LOLOL
4:02 PM - George, of the jungle: lol
#5
ruplayer Wrote:You need to move this thread to flamez section, cuz it feels like we're a bit handcuffed here, especially with the name of the thread.

BF3 has co-op mode! RUSH/TDM/CONQUEST why do you need more?
You're wrong about Recon class.
[Image: blog.png]
Screen from Battlelog.


I own BF3, and I think MW3 is the same old shit. 60$ map pack for MW2.

I'm more inclined to buy BF3 looking from a gameplay perspective. I already have Black Ops anyway too.

M. Bison Wrote:
Spartacus Wrote:Battlefield 3

Pros
Less Asshats playing this game
I refute these claims.

Thats not a nice thing to say about ruplayer. But honestly, I got this off that website.
be the best version of yourself, that's all you can do.
#6
You're being not nice Spartacus.
#7
I had almost all the Battle Field releases, & i played them all, and all were Great, none was bad.
& BF3 is AWESOME!
[Image: bxj6gaq99c9hyvinfkvn.jpg]
[Image: w0l5y0.png]
#8
ruplayer Wrote:You're being not nice Spartacus.

ru i'm just messing with you. drink more and you just might find it a little funny.
be the best version of yourself, that's all you can do.
#9
Spartacus Wrote:
ruplayer Wrote:You're being not nice Spartacus.

ru i'm just messing with you. drink more and you just might find it a little funny.

I'm at work.
#10
I prefer mw3,  Most people like bf3 better. 

mw3 is the same old shit as mw2, but i like mw2 Tongue    The single player is fucking amazing. Story line of the gods imo.  And i prefer to solo player clutch status and combat style of CoD    rather than the mass teamwork and huge battlefields of bf3
[Image: 8yi3kn.png]
rawr?

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)