First of all, there has been strong agreement that there is no legitimate evidence that ultma hacks.
Secondly, drunk is not focusing on the possibility that ultma hacks, but rather the notion of "ban evasion". He's trying to be professional by following the traditional process which has been used for bans/unbans.
Ordinarily, banned players are only able to rejoin the war-lords servers IF they are unbanned, and not before. It seems that the appropriate people have not yet made public a decision about whether or not ultma will be unbanned. And obviously ultma managed to join some of the war-lords servers, and was probably ignorant of the "perm ban" which had been wrongly placed upon him.
Of course, most of us are familiar with ultma, don't think he hacks, and would like him to be unbanned without all of the hassle.
Simply put: drunk is just attempting to "play by the books", while many of us want ultma to be "an exception to the rule".
silly (no sound): you need to learn
Zero: i taught you
silly (no sound): how to be cool like me
Zero: you knifed me when i retired
silly (no sound): I have hopes for you
silly (no sound): to be my apprentice
silly (no sound): my prodigy
silly (no sound): to carry on my legacy
silly (no sound): good luck padawan
silly (no sound): may the force be with you
Zero: lol
Zero: why you make it sound that you are never coming back alive master?
Zero:
silly (no sound): I will
silly (no sound): when you're ready
silly (no sound): to show me what you've learnt
silly (no sound): when you're a jedi