A horrible situation, and I feel bad for all involved. I think it's going to be hard for the daughter to get rid of the guilt.

Her father should have raped her..i think it could be a little fair.

A horrible situation, and I feel bad for all involved. I think it's going to be hard for the daughter to get rid of the guilt.

Her father should have raped her..i think it could be a little fair.

...... you need to see a doctor,
...... your mind is ...... ill, very ill.

A horrible situation, and I feel bad for all involved. I think it's going to be hard for the daughter to get rid of the guilt.

Her father should have raped her..i think it could be a little fair.

...... you need to see a doctor,
...... your mind is ...... ill, very ill.

lol

[M. Bison]

Her father should have raped her..i think it could be a little fair.

He still can.  :o

[Spartacus]

Her father should have raped her..i think it could be a little fair.

He still can.  :o

The thing is, not only can he do it, he won't even get caught for it.

Double jeopardy is a procedural defence that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same (or similar) charges following a legitimate acquittal or conviction. In common law countries, a defendant may enter a peremptory plea of autrefois acquit or autrefois convict (autrefois means "previously" in French), meaning the defendant has been acquitted or convicted of the same offence.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_jeopardy

waiting for the lawyer to be bro to input his advice.

[naive]

Her father should have raped her..i think it could be a little fair.

He still can.  :o

The thing is, not only can he do it, he won't even get caught for it.

Double jeopardy is a procedural defence that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same (or similar) charges following a legitimate acquittal or conviction. In common law countries, a defendant may enter a peremptory plea of autrefois acquit or autrefois convict (autrefois means "previously" in French), meaning the defendant has been acquitted or convicted of the same offence.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_jeopardy

waiting for the lawyer to be bro to input his advice.

An instance of rape in 2012 would be a separate charge from an instance of rape in 2001. Double jeopardy would not work here. Might go a long way to winning a trial though "she already lied about this shit once", but physical evidence could be damning regardless of testimony. If he like used a condom, and cleaned her up well enough afterwards he could probably get away with it if it came down to his word vs her word.

stupid girl!!  >
but i think she must have a reasons why she do that

stupid girl!!  >
but i think she must have a reasons why she do that

Yes, she wanted a iPhone.
Dad said no.

Naive, u r sick too.
can't do that to your own kids, doesn't matter what they done.

oh,man it seems you didn't understand well,the girl lied.
uh..meanwhile ,naive have you any Girl? :

[Spartacus]

Her father should have raped her..i think it could be a little fair.

He still can.  :o

The thing is, not only can he do it, he won't even get caught for it.

Double jeopardy is a procedural defence that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same (or similar) charges following a legitimate acquittal or conviction. In common law countries, a defendant may enter a peremptory plea of autrefois acquit or autrefois convict (autrefois means "previously" in French), meaning the defendant has been acquitted or convicted of the same offence.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_jeopardy

waiting for the lawyer to be bro to input his advice.

An instance of rape in 2012 would be a separate charge from an instance of rape in 2001. Double jeopardy would not work here. Might go a long way to winning a trial though "she already lied about this shit once", but physical evidence could be damning regardless of testimony. If he like used a condom, and cleaned her up well enough afterwards he could probably get away with it if it came down to his word vs her word.

but..but..but i've watched the movie and that was not how it worked! ???

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0150377/