Dr. Ruplayer, post: 67871, member: 9168 Wrote:1. A few people said "Too many unnecessary restrictions are already placed on the Awp.". Wait a minute, you remove some restrictions and you add other ones. You add one awp per user, but you remove 1 awp per team.

2. It is really good because it actually creates some better relation between players, motivates them for team work. Awpers will be making friends with regulars, so they can ask them to buy another awp and trade weapons. Non-Awpers will be picking dropped awp on the end of the round, so they can drop it at spawn for others on the beginning of the next round, or maybe just trade it for p90/m4/ak...

3. Sometimes I turn on tryharding and get high kills, but most of the time I join like any casual player, when I have 30 min - 1 hour free time. Sometimes I want to play with different weapons, like any casual player. I hit B-4-6 and it's already taken(1 sec after round started). Again, I can surely bind it, and my competition for that one awp will be down to only like 2-3 other people who binded it just like me, but what about the rest? Casual players, majority, people that hardly ever use their console? - I'll answer, no awp for them 99% of the time.

4. You wont see less awps, but you will see more different people holding them. You wont see less awps, but people will be using bigger variety of weapons.

5. Make it so awp can be picked, agree.

6. Tea, you're looking for some odd reason why would evil ruplayer created this thread, and you're coming to conclusion that "the thread owner has 7% of his kills with the AWP on Pop and 2% on Office. A non-AWPer trying to make things fair for awper, orly?". Really bro? You know me better than most people around here. I don't have any personal reasons or evil plans to create this thread. This thread is there because I can see how awp is not limited 1 per team, it's limited one per 2-3 same old people that continually use it, and only compete with each other for it. I really thought of servers in the first place when I created this thread. Don't try to find only bad in people, especially those people who can always back you up if needed, peace.

7. There are some yes and no votes, but overall voting process was falsified, it's not legit anymore. Bison will explain later.

8. Give it a try, worst case - we will change it back and forget about it, but give it a try first.

Thanks for taking time replying to this thread.

1. Its placing an overall restriction, no doubt about it.
2. Teamwork? Bartering? Or plain begging? Just longer delay in spawn so a rusher can flank and kill people while they are trying to the weapon change. The "not friends" running around the friends trying to "Steal" the weapons. Right.
3. You also have your preset buyouts, B then S,D,F,G.
4. Yes you will, winning team lots of money. The people who like to AWP buy, they DIE. Next round or so, others buy AWPs die. Rest of map No AWP for the team.
5. It already can, now it will encourage players to lurk the AWPer anymore if that is their only means to get a AWP.
6. I know why you created the thread. I don't hold back on anything like this. Has nothing to do with backing-up. Your play style is often stopped by the same AWPers often stopping a flank that would get you 3-4 easy kills. You get frustrated when players don't rush to their deaths and slow play the game. Not to mention, when that casual AWPer gets instantly killed with the AWP because of the lack of experience and now they won't/can't have it for the rest of the game? Right, that is fair and helping people get better at AWPing.
7. Poll, is fine if you notice it is a landslide against it.
8. unrestrict the AWP and see what happens then. Have we tried this?