Poll: How should it be? Show Results
The old way was just fine
16 41.03%
16+ = 1 AWP, 26+ = 2 AWPs, 34+ = 3 AWPs?
9 23.08%
Keep the current way they're set up
8 20.51%
AWP FREE!
4 10.26%
Other (Write Down)
2 5.13%
Total 39 vote(s) 100%
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Leave the AWPs the way it was
The 16+ = 1 AWP, 28+ = 2 AWPs, 36+ = 3 AWPs idea makes the most sense. Having 3 awps per team in a match with a small amount of players can get frustrating. Yeah the old way worked but it's nice giving more people a chance to use the awp. I've actually bought it a few times now that I don't have to feel like I should leave it for a better player.
one problem i experienced was that the awp was removed. reason "too many awps..." however, the players did not go down to 27 at any point. note: i bought the awp in the previous round.
Honestly the awp should be restricted on Mini Games Server to 1 every 16 players no matter what rules is applied, As i know alot of people have been avoiding att and defend maps due to it
[Image: 481925_101.png]
pooterking69420, post: 73282, member: 6134 Wrote:Honestly the awp should be restricted on Mini Games Server to 1 every 16 players no matter what rules is applied, As i know alot of people have been avoiding att and defend maps due to it
Honestly, players should get better using the weapons..
#Notanexcusetome
[Image: 1UH9a8H.png]



[Image: 5pfuEDP.gif]

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)